FREE IGNOU MPS-003 INDIA: DEMOCRACY AND DEVELOPMENT Solved Assignment July 2024–Jan 2025

FREE IGNOU MPS-003 INDIA: DEMOCRACY AND DEVELOPMENT Solved Assignment July 2024–Jan 2025

FREE IGNOU MPS-003 INDIA: DEMOCRACY AND DEVELOPMENT Solved Assignment July 2024–Jan 2025
FREE IGNOU MPS-003 INDIA: DEMOCRACY AND DEVELOPMENT Solved Assignment July 2024–Jan 2025

SECTION-I 

1. Explain the concept of development and its relationship with democracy.  

Development and democracy are interconnected concepts that often influence and reinforce each other. Here's an exploration of their relationship: 

Development refers to the process of economic, social, and political progress that improves the quality of life for individuals and communities. It encompasses a wide range of factors including economic growth, poverty reduction, education, healthcare, and infrastructure. Development is often measured by indicators such as GDP per capita, literacy rates, life expectancy, and access to basic services. 

Democracy, on the other hand, is a system of government where power is vested in the people, who exercise it directly or through elected representatives. Key features of democracy include free and fair elections, rule of law, protection of human rights, and the separation of powers. It allows for political participation, accountability, and transparency. 

The relationship between development and democracy is complex and multi-faceted: 

  1. Democracy as a Driver of Development: Democratic systems often promote development by ensuring that government policies are responsive to the needs of the populace. Elected representatives are accountable to their constituents, which can lead to policies that prioritize public welfare. Democracies tend to have better mechanisms for public debate and scrutiny, which can lead to more effective and equitable development outcomes. Furthermore, democratic governance can enhance stability and predictability, which are crucial for economic investments and growth. 

  1. Development as a Facilitator of Democracy: Conversely, development can support the growth of democratic institutions. Economic development typically leads to higher levels of education and information access, which can empower citizens to participate more actively in the democratic process. As societies develop economically, they often experience greater social and political freedoms, which can foster democratic practices. Improved living standards and economic security can also reduce the appeal of authoritarian regimes. 

  1. Mutual Reinforcement: Development and democracy can reinforce each other in a positive feedback loop. For instance, a well-developed society with strong institutions is more likely to sustain democratic practices, while a robust democracy can create an environment that supports further development. This mutual reinforcement can lead to sustainable progress and stability. 

  1. Challenges and Tensions: Despite the positive aspects of their relationship, there are also challenges and tensions. In some cases, rapid development or economic inequality can lead to social unrest, which may strain democratic institutions. Conversely, some democracies struggle with corruption or inefficiency that can hinder development. Additionally, there are instances where authoritarian regimes achieve rapid economic growth without democratic reforms, raising questions about the necessity of democracy for development. 

  1. Global Perspectives: The relationship between development and democracy is not uniform across the globe. Different countries experience varying degrees of success in balancing these two concepts. For example, some advanced democracies have high levels of development and social welfare, while some developing countries are making strides in both areas despite having less democratic governance. Conversely, some authoritarian regimes have managed to achieve significant economic development while limiting political freedoms. 

In summary, while democracy and development are distinct concepts, they are closely related and often mutually beneficial. Democracies can create an environment conducive to development by ensuring accountable governance and protecting individual rights. At the same time, development can enhance democratic practices by promoting education, economic stability, and political participation. However, their relationship is not without challenges, and the interplay between the two can vary based on specific national contexts and historical experiences. 

Buy Pdf And Solved Assignment 

📞 PHONE NUMBER - 8130208920 , 88822 85078  

🛒 Buy PDFs Online:  shop.senrig.in  

2. Analyse the functioning of the federal system in India.  

The federal system in India is a unique blend of federal and unitary characteristics, reflecting its vast geographical size, diverse population, and complex socio-political landscape. It is structured to balance the distribution of power between the central government and individual states, while also ensuring national unity and integrity. Here’s an analysis of how this federal system functions: 

1. Constitutional Framework 

India’s federal structure is defined by its Constitution, which was adopted in 1950. The Constitution establishes a dual system of governance, dividing powers between the Union (central) and State governments. This framework is detailed in three lists under the Seventh Schedule: 

  • Union List: Includes subjects of national importance such as defense, foreign affairs, and atomic energy. The central government has exclusive authority over these subjects. 

  • State List: Contains subjects of regional importance such as police, public health, and agriculture. States have exclusive jurisdiction over these areas. 

  • Concurrent List: Covers subjects of mutual interest like education, marriage, and bankruptcy. Both the Union and State governments can legislate on these matters, but in case of conflict, central law prevails. 

2. Distribution of Powers 

The Constitution outlines a clear division of powers and responsibilities: 

  • Union Government: Responsible for national defense, foreign policy, and major economic policies. It also has the power to intervene in states under certain conditions, such as during emergencies or if a law passed by a state is inconsistent with national policy. 

  • State Governments: Manage local administration, public health, and agriculture. States have the autonomy to govern these areas according to their specific needs and conditions. 

  • Concurrent Powers: Both levels of government can legislate on matters in the Concurrent List. If state laws conflict with central laws, the central laws will prevail, but states can also enact laws that are more progressive or beneficial within their jurisdiction. 

3. Institutional Mechanisms 

Several key institutions and mechanisms facilitate the functioning of the federal system: 

  • Parliament: The Indian Parliament is a bicameral legislature consisting of the Lok Sabha (House of the People) and the Rajya Sabha (Council of States). The Parliament has the authority to make laws on subjects in the Union and Concurrent Lists and can also create or abolish states and union territories. 

  • State Legislatures: Each state has its own legislature, which can be unicameral or bicameral. The state legislatures make laws on subjects in the State List and Concurrent List, subject to the central law. 

  • Supreme Court: The Supreme Court of India plays a crucial role in interpreting the Constitution and resolving disputes between the Union and State governments. It ensures that the distribution of powers is adhered to and addresses any conflicts arising from legislative actions. 

4. Federal Features and Unitary Aspects 

India’s federal system incorporates both federal and unitary features: 

  • Federal Features: 

  • Distribution of Powers: As outlined, the Constitution provides a clear distribution of powers between the Union and State governments. 

  • Dual Government: The Union and State governments operate independently within their spheres of authority. 

  • State Representation: States are represented in the Rajya Sabha, providing them a role in national legislation. 

  • Unitary Features: 

  • Emergency Provisions: The central government can assume greater powers during national, state, or financial emergencies, potentially overriding state authority. 

  • Central Control: The Union government has significant influence over states through its control of finances and appointment of key officials such as governors. 

  • Coordination: The central government can issue directives to states to ensure uniformity in policies and administration. 

5. Challenges and Issues 

The functioning of the federal system in India faces several challenges: 

  • Centre-State Relations: Tensions often arise between the central and state governments over issues of jurisdiction, financial allocation, and policy implementation. Conflicts may occur when central policies do not align with state interests or when states feel their autonomy is being encroached upon. 

  • Financial Dependence: States are financially dependent on the central government for a significant portion of their revenue, which can limit their autonomy and flexibility in governance. 

  • Political Dynamics: Political alignments and conflicts between the ruling parties at the Union and state levels can impact the smooth functioning of the federal system. Cooperation and coordination are crucial for effective governance. 

6. Recent Developments 

In recent years, there have been efforts to address some of these challenges: 

  • Devolution of Powers: There have been moves to devolve more powers to local governments and ensure greater financial autonomy for states. The 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendments aim to enhance the role of panchayats and municipalities. 

  • Inter-State Council: Established under Article 263 of the Constitution, this body facilitates coordination between the Union and State governments and addresses disputes. 

Conclusion 

India’s federal system is a dynamic and evolving framework designed to accommodate the diverse needs of its vast and varied population. While it effectively balances power between the Union and State governments, ongoing efforts are necessary to address challenges and ensure that the federal structure continues to function effectively in the interest of national unity and development. 

WhatsApp - 8130208920 , 88822 85078 

Telegram (software) - Wikipedia Follow For Updates: Myexamsolution

3. Elaborate on the Liberalisation, Privatisation, and Globalization (LPG) policies. 

The Liberalisation, Privatisation, and Globalisation (LPG) policies represent a significant economic reform framework adopted by India in the early 1990s. These policies were introduced to address the country’s economic challenges and to stimulate growth by integrating India more closely with the global economy. Here’s a detailed exploration of each component of the LPG policies and their impact on India’s economy: 

1. Liberalisation 

Liberalisation refers to the process of reducing government restrictions and controls on economic activities, thereby promoting a more market-driven economy. In the context of India, liberalisation aimed to transform a highly regulated and state-controlled economy into one that encourages competition, efficiency, and private enterprise. 

Key Aspects of Liberalisation: 

  • Trade Policy Reforms: The reduction of import tariffs and trade barriers was a cornerstone of liberalisation. India shifted from a protectionist trade policy to a more open trade regime, encouraging the import of goods and services that were previously restricted. This move aimed to expose domestic industries to global competition and improve their efficiency. 

  • Industrial Policy Reforms: The government deregulated various industries by removing the licensing requirements that previously controlled the establishment and expansion of businesses. This deregulation aimed to foster a more competitive environment and stimulate industrial growth. 

  • Foreign Investment: Liberalisation policies included measures to attract foreign direct investment (FDI) by easing restrictions and creating a more favorable business environment. This involved relaxing rules on foreign equity participation and simplifying procedures for foreign investors. 

  • Financial Sector Reforms: The financial sector underwent significant reforms, including the deregulation of interest rates, reduction in statutory liquidity requirements, and the introduction of new banking and financial instruments. These changes aimed to enhance the efficiency and competitiveness of the financial sector. 

2. Privatisation 

Privatisation refers to the process of transferring ownership and control of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) to private entities. The goal of privatisation is to improve the efficiency and performance of these enterprises by subjecting them to market discipline and competition. 

Key Aspects of Privatisation: 

  • Disinvestment: The Indian government began selling off stakes in state-owned enterprises through a process known as disinvestment. This approach aimed to reduce the fiscal burden on the government and raise funds for public expenditure. Disinvestment was carried out through public offerings, strategic sales, and asset sales. 

  • Strategic Sales: In addition to partial disinvestment, the government also pursued strategic sales where it sold controlling stakes in key SOEs to private investors. This was intended to bring in private expertise and management practices to improve the efficiency of these enterprises. 

  • Private Sector Participation: Privatisation also involved increasing private sector participation in industries that were previously monopolized by the state. This included sectors such as telecommunications, power, and transportation, where private players were allowed to enter and compete with state-owned entities. 

  • Impact on Employment and Services: While privatisation aimed to enhance efficiency, it also led to concerns about job losses and reduced access to services, particularly in sectors where state-owned enterprises provided essential services. Balancing efficiency with social welfare considerations was a key challenge during the privatisation process. 

3. Globalisation 

Globalisation refers to the process of increasing interconnectedness and interdependence of economies and societies across the world. For India, globalisation involved integrating the country’s economy with the global market by promoting international trade, investment, and cooperation. 

Key Aspects of Globalisation: 

  • Trade Integration: India actively participated in global trade by reducing trade barriers and joining international trade organizations such as the World Trade Organization (WTO). This included negotiating trade agreements, both bilateral and multilateral, to enhance market access for Indian goods and services. 

  • Investment Flows: Globalisation facilitated the flow of foreign direct investment (FDI) into India, bringing in capital, technology, and management expertise. The liberalisation of FDI regulations and the establishment of Special Economic Zones (SEZs) were designed to attract and harness global investment. 

  • Cultural and Technological Exchange: Globalisation also led to increased cultural and technological exchange between India and other countries. This included the adoption of global best practices in various sectors, the spread of international brands and products, and the influence of global media and entertainment. 

  • Challenges and Criticisms: While globalisation brought economic benefits, it also faced criticism for exacerbating income inequality and cultural homogenization. There were concerns about the impact of globalisation on local industries and small businesses, which struggled to compete with international players. 

Impact and Outcomes 

The LPG policies had a profound impact on India’s economy: 

  • Economic Growth: The reforms led to robust economic growth, with India experiencing significant increases in GDP and per capita income. The economy became one of the fastest-growing in the world, driven by increased private investment and enhanced global trade. 

  • Industrial Expansion: The deregulation of industries and increased competition spurred industrial expansion and diversification. New sectors emerged, and existing industries became more competitive and efficient. 

  • Consumer Benefits: Consumers benefited from a wider range of products and services, improved quality, and lower prices due to increased competition and global integration. 

  • Employment and Skill Development: The growth of new industries and the expansion of the services sector created employment opportunities and contributed to skill development in various sectors. 

  • Socio-Economic Disparities: Despite overall economic progress, the benefits of the reforms were unevenly distributed, leading to increased socio-economic disparities. Rural areas and disadvantaged groups often did not benefit equally from the economic boom. 

Conclusion 

The Liberalisation, Privatisation, and Globalisation (LPG) policies were transformative for India’s economy, leading to significant growth and modernization. While the reforms created numerous opportunities and enhanced India’s global economic standing, they also brought challenges and disparities that needed to be addressed. The LPG framework remains a critical component of India’s economic policy, shaping its development trajectory and its integration into the global economy. 

Buy Pdf And Solved Assignment 

📞 PHONE NUMBER - 8130208920 , 88822 85078  

🛒 Buy PDFs Online:  shop.senrig.in  

SECTION-II 

6. Explain the behavioralist concept of political participation.  

The behavioralist concept of political participation is a key area within political science that examines how individuals engage in political processes and activities. Rooted in behavioralism, a theoretical approach that emphasizes empirical research and observable behaviors over abstract theories, this concept focuses on the actions and behaviors of individuals rather than institutional structures or normative ideals. Here’s an in-depth exploration of the behavioralist concept of political participation: 

1. Behavioralist Perspective 

Behavioralism emerged as a prominent school of thought in political science during the mid-20th century. It emphasizes the study of actual political behavior and empirical data rather than theoretical or normative considerations. In this context, political participation is analyzed through the lens of individual actions and psychological factors influencing these actions. 

2. Definition of Political Participation 

Political participation, in the behavioralist sense, refers to the various ways in which individuals engage in political processes and activities. It encompasses a wide range of activities from voting in elections to participating in protests, contacting public officials, and engaging in community organizing. The focus is on understanding how and why people participate in these activities and the impact of their participation on political systems. 

3. Types of Political Participation 

Behavioralists categorize political participation into several types based on the level of engagement and the nature of the activities: 

  • Conventional Participation: This includes activities that are considered normative and institutionalized within the political system. Examples are voting, attending political meetings, joining political parties, and working in electoral campaigns. These activities are usually legal and sanctioned by the political system. 

  • Unconventional Participation: This encompasses activities that are less formal and often outside the traditional political framework. Examples include protests, demonstrations, civil disobedience, and petitioning. Such activities may challenge existing political structures or seek to address grievances not fully addressed through conventional means. 

4. Factors Influencing Political Participation 

Behavioralists identify several factors that influence political participation: 

  • Psychological Factors: Individual motivations, beliefs, and attitudes play a crucial role in determining political participation. For instance, a person’s political efficacy—the belief that their actions can influence political outcomes—can significantly impact their level of engagement. Higher political efficacy often correlates with increased participation. 

  • Socio-Demographic Factors: Characteristics such as age, education, income, and social status affect political participation. Research has shown that higher levels of education and income are associated with higher rates of political participation. Similarly, younger individuals may have different patterns of engagement compared to older generations. 

  • Political Context: The political environment and institutional factors also influence participation. Factors such as the level of political stability, the effectiveness of democratic institutions, and the presence of political parties and organizations can impact how individuals participate. For example, political instability or corruption may decrease participation levels due to a lack of trust in the system. 

  • Communication and Media: Access to information and media plays a significant role in shaping political behavior. The availability of information through traditional media (newspapers, television) and digital platforms (social media, websites) affects how individuals become informed about political issues and mobilize for participation. 

5. Theories of Political Participation 

Several behavioralist theories provide insights into political participation: 

  • Rational Choice Theory: This theory posits that individuals make rational decisions based on cost-benefit analysis. In the context of political participation, it suggests that people will participate in political activities if they perceive the benefits (such as achieving political goals) to outweigh the costs (such as time and effort). 

  • Social Capital Theory: This theory emphasizes the importance of social networks and relationships in facilitating political participation. According to this perspective, individuals are more likely to engage in political activities when they are embedded in networks that encourage or facilitate such engagement. 

  • Civic Voluntarism Model: This model focuses on the factors that contribute to voluntary political engagement. It highlights the role of individual resources (time, money, skills), psychological engagement (interest in politics, sense of duty), and mobilizing structures (organizations and groups) in shaping political participation. 

6. Impact of Political Participation 

Behavioralists examine the impact of political participation on democratic systems and political outcomes. Participation can lead to: 

  • Increased Representation: Higher levels of participation can lead to more representative and responsive governance. When a diverse range of citizens engage in the political process, it increases the likelihood that various interests and viewpoints are considered in policy-making. 

  • Enhanced Legitimacy: Participation contributes to the legitimacy of political systems. When citizens actively engage in political processes, it strengthens the sense of democratic legitimacy and trust in institutions. 

  • Policy Influence: Active participation can influence public policy and decision-making. Through voting, advocacy, and activism, individuals and groups can shape policies and bring attention to specific issues. 

7. Challenges and Limitations 

While the behavioralist approach provides valuable insights into political participation, it also faces certain limitations: 

  • Focus on Individual Behavior: Behavioralism’s emphasis on individual actions may overlook the broader structural and institutional factors that influence participation. Understanding political engagement requires a more comprehensive view that includes both individual behavior and systemic factors. 

  • Measurement Issues: Accurately measuring political participation can be challenging. Variations in definitions and data collection methods can affect the reliability and comparability of findings. 

  • Complexity of Motivation: Political participation is influenced by a complex interplay of factors, and behavioralist theories may not fully capture the nuances of individual motivations and experiences. 

Conclusion 

The behavioralist concept of political participation provides a framework for understanding how individuals engage in political activities and the factors that influence their behavior. By focusing on empirical research and observable actions, behavioralism offers valuable insights into the dynamics of political engagement, the impact of participation on democratic processes, and the challenges faced in promoting widespread and effective participation. However, a comprehensive understanding of political participation also requires considering broader structural and contextual factors beyond individual behavior. 

WhatsApp - 8130208920 , 88822 85078 

Telegram (software) - Wikipedia Follow For Updates: Myexamsolution

7.Explain the nature of regionalism in India. 

Regionalism in India is a significant and multifaceted phenomenon that influences the country's political, social, and economic landscape. It refers to the sense of identity, loyalty, and aspirations that people within specific geographic regions develop based on shared cultural, linguistic, historical, and economic characteristics. Here’s an in-depth analysis of the nature of regionalism in India: 

1. Historical Context 

Regionalism in India has deep historical roots. The country’s vast diversity, comprising numerous ethnic groups, languages, religions, and cultures, has historically led to the formation of regional identities. During colonial rule, the British administration often employed a strategy of divide and rule, which further entrenched regional identities. Post-independence, the legacy of colonial boundaries and administrative divisions continued to influence regional dynamics. 

2. Cultural and Linguistic Diversity 

India is home to a rich tapestry of languages, religions, and cultural practices. The linguistic diversity is particularly pronounced, with 22 officially recognized languages and several hundred dialects spoken across the country. Regionalism often manifests along linguistic lines, with demands for the recognition of regional languages and cultural autonomy. For example: 

  • Language-Based States: The creation of states based on linguistic lines, such as Tamil Nadu (for Tamil speakers) and Andhra Pradesh (for Telugu speakers), was a significant step in addressing regional aspirations. The States Reorganisation Act of 1956 aimed to align administrative boundaries with linguistic identities. 

  • Cultural Festivals and Traditions: Regional festivals, traditions, and cultural practices often foster a sense of regional identity and pride. Celebrations like Pongal in Tamil Nadu, Baisakhi in Punjab, and Onam in Kerala are integral to regional identity and cultural expression. 

3. Political Regionalism 

Political regionalism refers to the political mobilization of regional identities and demands for greater autonomy or recognition. It often involves: 

  • Regional Political Parties: India has numerous regional political parties that advocate for the interests and aspirations of specific regions. Parties like the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) in Tamil Nadu, the Shiv Sena in Maharashtra, and the Trinamool Congress in West Bengal focus on regional issues and aspirations. 

  • Autonomy and Decentralization: Some regions seek greater political and administrative autonomy from the central government. The demand for greater state autonomy or federal restructuring has been a recurring theme in Indian politics. For example, the demand for a separate Gorkhaland state in West Bengal and the movement for Bodoland in Assam reflect regional aspirations for political recognition and self-governance. 

  • Federal Dynamics: The Indian Constitution provides for a federal structure with a clear division of powers between the central and state governments. However, tensions occasionally arise over issues of jurisdiction, resource allocation, and central-state relations. These tensions can exacerbate regional sentiments and demands. 

4. Economic Factors 

Economic disparities between regions often fuel regionalism. Uneven economic development can lead to grievances and demands for greater resources and opportunities. Key aspects include: 

  • Development Disparities: Regions with lower levels of economic development may feel marginalized and demand greater attention and resources. For instance, the demand for special status or additional resources by states like Bihar and Uttar Pradesh is partly driven by economic disparities. 

  • Resource Distribution: Conflicts over the allocation of resources, such as water and natural resources, can also spark regional tensions. Issues like the sharing of river waters between states, such as the Cauvery dispute between Karnataka and Tamil Nadu, highlight the economic dimensions of regionalism. 

  • Economic Autonomy: Some regions advocate for greater economic autonomy to manage their resources and development policies. This includes demands for control over local industries, taxation, and economic planning. 

5. Social Dimensions 

Regionalism in India is also influenced by social factors such as identity, religion, and social justice: 

  • Identity Politics: Regionalism often intersects with identity politics, where regional identities are tied to social and cultural identities. For example, movements advocating for the rights of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes within specific regions can also have a regional dimension. 

  • Social Justice and Equity: Regional movements may address issues of social justice and equity. For example, the demand for reservations (affirmative action) for specific communities within states reflects regional and social justice concerns. 

6. Impact on National Integration 

Regionalism has both positive and negative impacts on national integration: 

  • Positive Contributions: Regionalism can foster a sense of local identity and cultural pride, contributing to the rich diversity of India. It can also promote regional development by drawing attention to local needs and issues. In some cases, regional parties and movements have successfully advocated for local issues and contributed to national policy discussions. 

  • Challenges to National Integration: Excessive regionalism can challenge national unity and cohesion. It can lead to fragmentation and conflicts between regions, affecting the stability and effectiveness of governance. The rise of regional movements and demands for autonomy can sometimes undermine national integration efforts. 

7. Recent Trends and Developments 

In recent years, regionalism in India has continued to evolve, influenced by various factors: 

  • Emerging Regional Leaders: New regional leaders and parties have emerged, focusing on issues such as local governance, development, and social justice. These leaders often advocate for regional rights and influence national politics. 

  • Economic Liberalization: The economic reforms of the 1990s and subsequent liberalization have had varying impacts on regional economies. While some regions have benefited from economic growth, others continue to face challenges, fueling regional aspirations. 

  • Globalization and Technology: The impact of globalization and technology has also influenced regional dynamics. Increased connectivity and access to information have empowered regional movements and facilitated greater mobilization. 

Conclusion 

Regionalism in India is a complex and multifaceted phenomenon rooted in the country's diverse cultural, linguistic, and historical context. It manifests in various forms, including political, economic, and social dimensions. While regionalism contributes to the vibrant diversity and local identity of India, it also presents challenges to national integration and governance. Understanding the nature of regionalism requires a nuanced perspective that considers both the aspirations of regions and the broader context of national unity and development. 

Buy Pdf And Solved Assignment 

📞 PHONE NUMBER - 8130208920 , 88822 85078  

🛒 Buy PDFs Online:  shop.senrig.in  

FREE IGNOU MPS-003 INDIA: DEMOCRACY AND DEVELOPMENT Solved Assignment July 2024–Jan 2025

We provide handwritten PDF and Hardcopy to our IGNOU and other university students. There are several types of handwritten assignment we provide all Over India. We are genuinely work in this field for so many time. You can get your assignment done - 8130208920 , 88822 85078 

Important Note - You may be aware that you need to submit your assignments before you can appear for the Term End Exams. Please remember to keep a copy of your completed assignment, just in case the one you submitted is lost in transit. 

FREE IGNOU MPS-003 INDIA: DEMOCRACY AND DEVELOPMENT Solved Assignment July 2024–Jan 2025

We provide handwritten PDF and Hardcopy to our IGNOU and other university students. There are several types of handwritten assignment we provide all Over India. We are genuinely work in this field for so many time. You can get your assignment done - 8130208920 , 88822 85078 

WhatsApp -8130208920 , 88822 85078 

Telegram (software) - Wikipedia Follow For Updates: senrigbookhouse 

🛒 Buy PDFs Online:  shop.senrig.in  

0 comments:

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.