Q. A purchase manager knows that the hardness of castings from any supplier is normally distributed with a mean of 20.25 and SD of 2.5. He picks up 100 samples of castings from any supplier who claims that his castings have heavier hardness and finds the mean hardness as 20.50. Test whether the claim of the supplier is tenable.
Step
1: Formulate Hypotheses
1.
Null
Hypothesis (H₀): The mean hardness of the castings
is 20.25 (no difference from the general mean).
o
H0:μ=20.25H_0 : \mu = 20.25H0:μ=20.25
2.
Alternative
Hypothesis (H₁): The mean hardness of the castings
is greater than 20.25 (supporting the supplier’s claim of higher hardness).
o
H1:μ>20.25H_1 : \mu > 20.25H1:μ>20.25
This is a one-tailed test since we
are specifically interested in whether the mean hardness is higher, not just
different.
Step
2: Set Significance Level
Typically, a 5% significance level (α=0.05\alpha
= 0.05α=0.05) is used, unless specified otherwise. This means we’ll reject the
null hypothesis if the probability of obtaining a sample mean at least as extreme
as 20.50 is less than 0.05.
Step
3: Calculate the Test Statistic
The formula for the z-test statistic
when testing the mean is:
z=xˉ−μσ/nz = \frac{\bar{x} -
\mu}{\sigma / \sqrt{n}}z=σ/nxˉ−μ
Where:
- xˉ=20.50\bar{x} = 20.50xˉ=20.50 (sample mean)
- μ=20.25\mu = 20.25μ=20.25 (population mean under the
null hypothesis)
- σ=2.5\sigma = 2.5σ=2.5 (population standard deviation)
- n=100n = 100n=100 (sample size)
Substitute the values:
z=20.50−20.252.5/100z = \frac{20.50
- 20.25}{2.5 / \sqrt{100}}z=2.5/10020.50−20.25 z=0.252.5/10=0.250.25=1z =
\frac{0.25}{2.5 / 10} = \frac{0.25}{0.25} = 1z=2.5/100.25=0.250.25=1
So, z=1.00z = 1.00z=1.00.
Step
4: Determine the p-Value
For a z-score of 1.00 in a
one-tailed test, we check the p-value associated with z = 1.00. Consulting a
z-table or standard normal distribution:
p=P(Z>1.00)≈0.1587p = P(Z >
1.00) \approx 0.1587p=P(Z>1.00)≈0.1587
Step
5: Compare p-Value with Significance Level
Since p=0.1587p = 0.1587p=0.1587 is
greater than α=0.05\alpha = 0.05α=0.05, we fail to reject the null
hypothesis.
Conclusion
There isn’t sufficient evidence to
support the supplier’s claim that the mean hardness of the castings is higher
than the population mean of 20.25. The observed difference in sample mean
(20.50) is not statistically significant at the 5% level, so the claim of
"heavier hardness" is not tenable based on this sample data.
0 comments:
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.