The role of UN to the concept of self -determination and its application
Corporate sustainability starts with a company’s value
system and a principles-based approach to doing business. This means operating
in ways that, at a minimum, meet fundamental responsibilities in the areas of
human rights, labour, environment and anti-corruption. Responsible businesses
enact the same values and principles wherever they have a presence, and know
that good practices in one area do not offset harm in another. By incorporating
the Ten Principles of the UN Global Compact into strategies, policies and
procedures, and establishing a culture of integrity, companies are not only
upholding their basic responsibilities to people and planet, but also setting
the stage for long-term success.
The Ten Principles of the United Nations Global Compact are
derived from: the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International
Labour Organization’s Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work,
the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, and the United Nations
Convention Against Corruption.
Human Rights
Principle 1: Businesses should support and respect the
protection of internationally proclaimed human rights; and
Principle 2: make sure that they are not complicit in human
rights abuses.
Labour
Principle 3: Businesses should uphold the freedom of
association and the effective recognition of the right to collective
bargaining;
Principle 4: the elimination of all forms of forced and
compulsory labour;
Principle 5: the effective abolition of child labour; and
Principle 6: the elimination of discrimination in respect of
employment and occupation.
Environment
Principle 7: Businesses should support a precautionary
approach to environmental challenges;
Principle 8: undertake initiatives to promote greater
environmental responsibility; and
Principle 9: encourage the development and diffusion of
environmentally friendly technologies. Anti-Corruption
Principle 10: Businesses should work against corruption in
all its forms, including extortion and bribery. Maintenance of international
peace and security
Maintenance of international peace and security
The main function of the United Nations is to preserve
international peace and security. Chapter 6 of the Charter provides for the
pacific settlement of disputes, through the intervention of the Security
Council, by means such as negotiation, mediation, arbitration, and judicial
decisions. The Security Council may investigate any dispute or situation to
determine whether it is likely to endanger international peace and security. At
any stage of the dispute, the council may recommend appropriate procedures or
methods of adjustment, and, if the parties fail to settle the dispute by
peaceful means, the council may recommend terms of settlement.
The goal of collective security, whereby aggression against
one member is met with resistance by all, underlies chapter 7 of the Charter,
which grants the Security Council the power to order coercive measures—ranging
from diplomatic, economic, and military sanctions to the use of armed force—in
cases where attempts at a peaceful settlement have failed. Such measures were
seldom applied during the Cold War, however, because tensions between the
United States and the Soviet Union prevented the Security Council from agreeing
on the instigators of aggression. Instead, actions to maintain peace and
security often took the form of preventive diplomacy and peacekeeping. In the
post-Cold War period, appeals to the UN for peacekeeping and related activities
increased dramatically, and new threats to international peace and security
were confronted, including AIDS and international terrorism.
Notwithstanding the primary role of the Security Council, the UN Charter provides for the participation of the General Assembly and nonmember states in security issues. Any state, whether it is a member of the UN or not, may bring any dispute or situation that endangers international peace and security to the attention of the Security Council or the General Assembly. The Charter authorizes the General Assembly to “discuss any questions relating to the maintenance of international peace and security” and to “make recommendations with regard to any such questions to the state or states concerned or to the Security Council or to both.” This authorization is restricted by the provision that, “while the Security Council is exercising in respect of any dispute or situation the functions assigned to it in the present Charter, the General Assembly shall not make any recommendation with regard to that dispute or situation unless the Security Council so requests.” By the “Uniting for Peace” resolution of November 1950, however, the General Assembly granted to itself the power to deal with threats to the peace if the Security Council fails to act after a veto by a permanent member. Although these provisions grant the General Assembly a broad secondary role, the Security Council can make decisions that bind all members, whereas the General Assembly can make only recommendations.
0 comments:
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.