The behaviouristic and innate theory of language acquisition.

Behaviouristic Theory

The behaviourist psychologists developed their theories while completing a series of experiments on animals. The behaviouristic and innate theory of language acquisition. They observed that rats or birds, as an example , could be taught to perform various tasks by encouraging habit-forming. Researchers rewarded desirable behaviour. This was mentioned as positive reinforcement. Undesirable behaviour was punished or simply not rewarded — negative reinforcement. The behaviouristic and innate theory of language acquisition. The behaviourist B. F. Skinner then proposed this theory as an evidence for language acquisition in humans.

The behaviouristic and innate theory of language acquisition. In Verbal Behaviour (1957), he stated: “The basic processes and relations which give verbal behaviour its special characteristics are now fairly well understood. The behaviouristic and innate theory of language acquisition. Much of the experimental work responsible for this advance has been administered on other species, but the results have proved to be surprisingly free of species restrictions. Recent work has shown that the methods are often extended to human behaviour without serious modifications.”

Skinner suggested that a toddler imitates the language of its parents or carers. The behaviouristic and innate theory of language acquisition. Successful attempts are rewarded because an adult who recognises a word spoken by a toddler will praise the child and/or provides it what it's asking for .

The linguistic input was key — a model for imitation to be either negatively or positively reinforced. The behaviouristic and innate theory of language acquisition. Successful utterances are therefore reinforced while unsuccessful ones are forgotten. No essential difference between the way a rat learns to barter a maze and a toddler learns to speak .

Innateness Theory

Noam Chomsky published a criticism of the behaviourist theory in 1957. additionally to a number of the arguments listed above, he focused particularly on the impoverished language input children receive. The behaviouristic and innate theory of language acquisition. This theory is connected with the writings of Chomsky, although the idea has been around for many years. Children are born with an innate capacity for learning human language.

Humans are destined to talk . Children discover the grammar of their language supported their own inborn grammar. Certain aspects of language structure seem to be preordained by the cognitive structure of the human mind. The behaviouristic and innate theory of language acquisition. This accounts surely very basic universal features of language structure: every language has nouns/verbs, consonants and vowels. it's assumed that children are preprogrammed, hard-wired, to accumulate such things. The behaviouristic and innate theory of language acquisition. Yet nobody has been ready to explain how quickly and perfectly all children acquire their language . Every language is extremely complex, filled with subtle distinctions that speakers aren't even conscious of . Nevertheless, children master their language in 5 or 6 years no matter their other talents and general intellectual ability.

The behaviouristic and innate theory of language acquisition. Acquisition must certainly be quite mere imitation; it also doesn’t seem to depend upon levels of general intelligence, since even a severely retarded child will acquire a language without special training. The behaviouristic and innate theory of language acquisition. Some innate feature of the mind must be liable for the universally rapid and natural acquisition of language by any young child exposed to speech.

Previous Question                                                      Next Question 

• Tweet
• Share
• Share
• Share