John Rawls’ theory of justice
INTRODUCTION
John Rawls’ theory of Justice is of central importance in political practice and
theory. In defending or opposing laws, public policies and administrative
decisions of governments, appeals are made to notions of justice. Justice is
additionally invoked in social and political movements, direct action and
satyagraha campaigns. John
Rawls’ theory of Justice
,Thus, the civil rights or civil liberties movements are essentially movements
for justice. So are the dalit, feminist and environmental movements. While an
honest or good society or polity must have several virtues, justice is,
consistent with a widespread view, the primary of them.
Rawl’s Theory
of Justice
Critique of
Utilitarianism
John Rawls’ theory
of Justice Rawls’s principles of
social justice are a corrective to the liberal-utilitarian principle of the
best happiness of the best number. What then are his objections to
utilitarianism? Rawls recognises that liberal utilitarianism marked a
progressive, welfare-oriented departure from classical liberalism’s
preoccupation with individualistic rights. Yet, utilitarianism is, in Rawls’s
view, a morally flawed theory of justice. Its moral flaw is that it justifies
or condones the sacrificing of the great of some individuals for the sake of
the happiness of the best number. For the utilitarians, the criterion of
justice during a society is that the aggregate sum of utility or happiness or
welfare it produces, and not the well-being or welfare of every member of the
society.
Rawls’s Liberal-Egalitarian
Principles of Justice
According to Rawls, a stable, reasonably well-off
society is “a cooperative venture for mutual advantage.” along side cooperation, there's also conflict among
its members regarding their share of the burdens and benefits of social living.
the aim of principles of social justice is to make sure that the distribution
of the advantages and burdens of society is simply or fair to all or any its
members. John Rawls’ theory of Justice the essential institutions of society
should, consistent with Rawls, be so constructed on make sure the continuous
distribution of “social primary goods” to all or any the members of society
during a fair or simply manner. “Social primary goods” are goods, which are
distributed by the essential structure of a society. They include rights and liberties,
powers and opportunities, and income and wealth.
The agreement
Procedure
So far, our focus
has been on the content or substance of Rawls’s principles of
social/distributive justice. John Rawls’ theory of Justice allow us to now turn briefly to his method or
procedure of argumentation in defense of these principles. Why, consistent with
Rawls, should we accept his principles, instead of another principles (say, the
utilitarian or libertarian principles), as principles of just or fair
distribution? Briefly stated, Rawls’s response is that a agreement method or
procedure of political deliberation respects the Kantian liberal-egalitarian
moral idea of the liberty and equality of all persons which an agreement or
contract received through such a way or procedure is simply or fair to all or
any the parties thereto contract.
The Basic Structure of
Society
Rawls has
persuasively shown that social justice is of crucial importance to social life
which it should inform constitutions, laws, policies, legal processes, etc. John
Rawls’ theory of Justice , In fact, consistent with him, the first subject of
justice is that the basic structure of society. His principles of social
justice justifies, and is justified by, liberal democracy, a regulated free
enterprise and therefore the liberal-egalitarian state . He states that for
translating his Difference Principle into practice, the govt should have four branches,
viz.,
i) an allocation
branch “to keep the worth system workably competitive and to stop the formation
of unreasonable market power”
ii) a
stabilisation branch to cause “reasonably full employment” and, jointly with
the allocation branch, to take care of the efficiency of the free
enterprise
iii) a transfer
branch to attend to “the claims of need and an appropriate standard of life”
and
iv) a distribution
branch “to preserve an appropriate justice in distributive shares” by taxation
measures and adjustments in property rights.
0 comments:
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.