How is Aristotle meant when he said, ‘pleasure
proper to tragedy’
INTRODUCTION
Aristotle (384-322BC) the scholar of famous educationist and
theoretician Plato differed from his master as he was more inclined in
describing and classifying things as they were. However, he followed Plato in
defining poetry as ‘mimesis’ but during a different way. He regarded mimesis as
a natural healthy impulse. The proposal for tragedy consistent with Aristotle
was unity of action, place and time which became famous later because the three
unities. Another contribution he did within the field was the notion of
Catharsis. Talking about pleasure in his book Poetics Aristotle says, they're
of three types. First, when it comes from pity and fear through imitation.
Secondly, pleasure is claimed to be derived from completeness and wholeness of
action during a plot. within the third, pleasure is claimed to be a results of
music and spectacular effects.
However, all kinds of delight isn't found in tragedy. It
affords only those which is proper thereto or are often said as pleasure proper
to tragedy. In his work ‘Poetics’ Aristotle says, The pleasure which the poet
should afford is that which comes from pity and fear through imitation. Pity
and fear are man’s sympathy for the great a part of " a part of mankind
within the bad part of their experiences. Pity is evoked when there's
discrepancy between the agent and fate and fear when there's likeness between
the agent and us.
In Joyce’s A Portrait of the Artist as a young Man, we discover the definition where he
calls pity the sensation which arrests the mind within the presence of
whatsoever is grave and constant in human sufferings and unities it with the human
sufferer. Terror or fear is that which unities it with the key cause. Similar
definitions we discover in Aristotle’s book Rhetoric. There he defines them as
a species of pain. it's here that we will begin to think about the thought that
tragic pleasure derives from the purgation of those emotions. Aristotle unlike
his teacher Plato says that the emotions are good in themselves. Therefore,
there should be no got to purge the emotions of pity and fear. Instead, a more
sensible definition of the tragic pleasure would be- concomitant with the right
feelings of those emotions. By ‘proper’ he means temperate attitude to those
emotions. within the Ethics, Aristotle says, Fear and confidence and appetite
and anger and pity and generally pleasure and pain could also be felt both an
excessive amount of and insufficient and in both cases not well; but to feel
them at the proper times with regard to the proper objects, towards the proper
people, with the proper motive and within the right way is what's both intermediate
and best and this is often characteristic of virtue. We analyse, Aristotle
discusses two sorts of pleasure- pure and incidental. the previous is universal
and is amid no pain and is likened to the pleasure arising out of
contemplation. those that experience this do so solely by contemplating and
appraising the imitation of human emotions in tragedy. it's through this view
that we bring our specialise in his statement, Pleasure is affected through
imitation.
Aristotle meant when
he said, ‘pleasure proper to tragedy’
As Aristotle said imitation is itself an enjoyable act, all
of this is applicable to epic also as tragedy and may probably be extended to
other sorts of poetry. The specifically ‘tragic’ pleasure is that concerning
the medium and therefore the dramatic mode of the tragedy. These constitute the
precise imitative aspect of tragedy. A heightened sense of pity and fear is
affected when the required and probable events take an unexpected turn. this is
often possible within the complex plot. For e.g. by the top of Oedipus , we
feel an appreciation for all the tragic ironies involving sight and blindness,
fate and discretion , family love and incest and truth and ignorance.
Pleasure proper to
tragedy All of those feelings are the results of a posh plot; a series of oracles; ironies and
complications that it seems were destined for tragedy. Ironically, we enjoy the
facts that Clytemnestra kills herself but Oedipus doesn’t; it seems just to us.
We pity both mother and son, and that we fear that such corruption may befall
our families also . So, the pleasure comes at intersection of pity, fear and
appreciation of a plot that's resolved tragically but deservedly. Therefore,
our examination of the weather of the complex plot has led us to a consideration
of pity and fear. These along side imitation help us to know the pleasure
proper to tragedy.
It is worthwhile to notice that unlike modem theatre, Ancient
Greek theatre was religious. Plays were performed only during festivals, a time
when society communicated with its ancestors and gods. This choice of timing
influenced the character of theatrical performances and therefore the
techniques of presentation. as an example , Greek theatre, not only grew out of
dance, it also retained dance and music as major activities. The strong
emotions generated while worshipping the gods and therefore the ancestors also
provided an aesthetics of arousal which we discover at its core. This aesthetic
value was formulated as catharsis. These dramatic festivals were often held at
sites like the temple of Asklepios at Epidauros where patients were also
treated for diseases.
The basic difference Aristotle draws between tragedy and other genres, like comedy
and therefore the epic, is that the "tragic pleasure of pity and
fear" the audience feel watching a tragedy. so as for the tragic hero to
arouse these feelings within the audience, he can't be either all good or all
evil but must be someone the audience can identify with; however, if he's
superior in some way(s), the tragic pleasure is intensified. His disastrous end
results from a mistaken action, which successively arises from a hamartia or
from a tragic error in judgment. Pleasure proper to Tragedy Often the hamartia
is hubris, an excessive pride that causes the hero to ignore a divine warning
or to interrupt an ethical law. Pleasure proper to Tragedy, it's been suggested
that because the tragic hero's suffering is bigger than his offense, the
audience feels pity; because the audience members perceive that they might
behave similarly, they feel pity. Although, Aristotle has talked about the
right pleasure (oekeia hedone) of tragedy, it's axiomatically accepted that
this hedone is felt within the folds of catharsis which may be a general
psychological state that tragedy must cause (where? if the play as Else
suggests, or within the audience as Butcher says).
Catharsis, then has been accepted because the end of tragedy, and by implication of all drama: But
as we shall see, this wasn't true consistent with the text of the Poetics. As a
results of an exclusive reading of Aristotle's famous definition of tragedy,
catharsis has been considered the only aim of tragedy. But it's obvious, that
for Aristotle, whatever may are the function of tragedy and however essential
catharsis may are thereto , catharsis alone wasn't the aim of tragedy. Besides
catharsis, Aristotle has mentioned within the Poetics, a 'pleasure which is
proper only to tragedy' and which presumably isn't to be found in comedy or the
other literary form.
Are "proper pleasure" (oikeia hedone) and catharsis
mutually exclusive, synonymous or intertwined? There are three places within
the Poetics where pleasure is talked about. within the first place, Aristotle
says that tragedy cannot afford all kinds of delight but only that which is
proper thereto , and this comes about from pity and fear through imitation.
within the second place, pleasure is claimed to be derived from completeness
and wholeness of action during a plot. within the third instance, pleasure is
claimed to be a results of music and spectacular effects.
Because the famous definition has it: "Tragedy, then, is
an imitation of an action that's serious, complete, and of a particular
magnitude: in language embellished with each quite artistic ornament, the
several kinds being found in separate parts of the play within the sort of
action, not of narrative: through pity and fear effecting the purgation or
katharsis of those emotions." From this it's clear that hedone and
catharsis aren't mutually exclusive as both are caused by the arousal of pity
and fear through imitation.
Pleasure proper to Tragedy, Music causes pleasure then does
catharsis, because it is claimed within the Politics. Pleasure is additionally
caused by the completeness of action which in itself is supposed to arouse pity
and fear, Thus, albeit , proper pleasure (hedone) and catharsis are seen to be
intertwined they ought to be recognised as distinct from one another . In no
case, should catharsis alone be considered the top of tragedy, as is usually done
by literary critics. About the character of proper pleasure (hedone), Aristotle
states that each activity has its own proper pleasure. Thus proper pleasures
within the comic, tragic, satyric, epic and nomoic genres will all very .
Aristotle doesn't propose that underlying of these delights there could also be
a standard denominator, a literary or a poetic pleasure.
Next Question
PDF & Handwritten Assignment Notes
WhatsApp
8130208920
The English is so incorrect in these answers, they are not coherent. It appears as if a 12th grade student has answered these questions.
ReplyDeleteThe English is so incorrect in these answers, they are not coherent. It appears as if a 12th grade student has answered these questions.
ReplyDelete