“The family I have now protected for year… He left behind a son, the one who lives here now, And he’s as bad as dad and granddad were before, And yet his only daughter daily worships me.”
The given lines
are spoken by Apollo in Aeschylus’ The Eumenides, the
final play of The Oresteia trilogy. In this passage, Apollo defends his
long-standing protection of the House of Atreus, particularly his role
in guiding and justifying the actions of Orestes, who has killed his
mother Clytemnestra to avenge his father Agamemnon. These lines reflect
Apollo’s divine authority, his moral reasoning, and the inherited curse that
haunts the family across generations.
When Apollo
says, “The family I have now protected for years”, he refers to his
guardianship over the Atreid lineage, a house marked by bloodshed, revenge, and
moral corruption. The House of Atreus is infamous in Greek mythology for its
cycle of violence—beginning with Tantalus, continuing through Atreus and
Thyestes, and later manifesting in Agamemnon’s sacrifice of his daughter
Iphigenia and Clytemnestra’s murder of Agamemnon. Apollo positions himself as a
stabilizing divine force attempting to bring order and justice to a family
otherwise ruled by vengeance and inherited guilt.
The line “He
left behind a son, the one who lives here now” clearly refers to Agamemnon’s
son, Orestes, who has taken refuge at Apollo’s temple in Delphi after
committing matricide. Orestes’ presence there emphasizes Apollo’s direct
involvement in human affairs, especially in matters of justice and moral
obligation. Importantly, Orestes did not act on impulse; he killed Clytemnestra
on Apollo’s command. Thus, Apollo assumes responsibility for Orestes’ actions
and openly challenges the authority of the Furies, who demand punishment
for the crime of killing one’s mother.
Apollo’s
admission that Orestes is “as bad as dad and granddad were before”
acknowledges the deeply ingrained moral corruption of the Atreid family. This
statement is significant because it shows Apollo’s realism and honesty—he does
not idealize Orestes as a flawless hero. Instead, he recognizes that violence
has been normalized within this lineage. However, unlike the Furies, who see
only crime and blood-guilt, Apollo believes that this cycle can be broken through
rational justice rather than endless revenge.
The most
striking part of the passage is the contrast Apollo draws between Orestes and
his sister: “And yet his only daughter daily worships me.” This refers
to Electra, Agamemnon’s daughter, who remains devoted to Apollo and
supports Orestes’ act of vengeance. Electra represents loyalty to the father
and faith in divine justice. Her devotion highlights an important theme in The
Oresteia: the shift from primitive, blood-based justice to a more reasoned
and institutional form of law supported by the Olympian gods.
Electra’s
worship also strengthens Apollo’s argument that Orestes’ act was not morally
isolated or purely criminal. It had social and religious approval within the
family. While the Furies represent ancient, chthonic laws centered on maternal
bonds and blood vengeance, Apollo represents a newer moral order that
prioritizes paternal authority, social stability, and divine command. This
ideological conflict lies at the heart of The Eumenides.
Apollo’s
defense of Orestes must also be understood within the larger purpose of the
play—to dramatize the evolution of justice. Apollo’s position is not
that Orestes is innocent in a simplistic sense, but that his crime must be
judged within a broader ethical and legal framework. This ultimately leads to
the establishment of the Athenian court of the Areopagus, presided over
by Athena, where reasoned debate replaces endless cycles of revenge.
Thus, the
passage underscores Apollo’s role as both protector and reformer. He recognizes
human weakness and inherited guilt but insists that divine guidance and
rational judgment can bring resolution. By invoking his long protection of the
Atreid family and the contrasting devotion of Electra, Apollo argues that
justice must evolve beyond primitive retaliation.
In conclusion,
this passage highlights the central concerns of The Eumenides: inherited
sin, divine authority, and the transformation of justice. Apollo’s words reveal
his commitment to ending the curse of the House of Atreus and establishing a
new moral order. Through his defense of Orestes, Aeschylus presents a powerful
vision of justice grounded in reason, law, and divine balance rather than
endless bloodshed.
🌐 Visit: shop.senrig.in
Read Also :
Do you agree with Plato’s criticism that the Iliad offers no morals? Give a detailed answer.

0 comments:
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.