Q. What are the essential elements of a valid contract.
A void
contract and a voidable contract are both terms used
in contract law to describe different types of contracts that do not fully meet
the legal requirements of enforceability, but they differ significantly in
their nature and the rights they afford the parties involved.
Void Contract
A void
contract is one that is legally unenforceable from the very beginning,
meaning it lacks one or more essential elements required to form a valid
contract. Because it is considered null and void, it has no legal effect and
cannot be enforced by any party. In other words, from the outset, the contract
is treated as though it never existed in the eyes of the law. The elements that
might render a contract void include illegal subject matter, contracts that
violate public policy, and contracts entered into by parties who lack the
capacity to contract, such as minors or mentally incapacitated individuals.
 |
For example, if
two parties enter into a contract for the sale of illegal drugs, the contract
is void because the subject matter is illegal. Similarly, a contract made with
a minor, unless it is for essential items, will also be void in many
jurisdictions, as minors typically do not have the legal capacity to enter into
binding contracts.
In a void
contract, neither party can seek any remedy or compensation under the contract.
For example, in the case of a void contract for illegal activities, neither
party can sue for breach of contract, because the contract itself is considered
to have no legal standing.
Voidable Contract
On the other hand,
a voidable contract is a contract that is initially valid and
enforceable but may become voidable at the discretion of one or more of the
parties involved. In a voidable contract, at least one party has the right to
cancel or rescind the contract due to certain legal defenses or factors such as
misrepresentation, undue influence, duress, or lack of capacity.
A contract may be
voidable if it was entered into under circumstances that made one of the
parties vulnerable to coercion or deception. For example, if a person is
coerced into signing a contract under duress or if they were misled about the
terms of the contract, the victimized party may have the right to void the
contract. Similarly, contracts entered into by minors, intoxicated persons, or
individuals who lack the mental capacity to understand the nature of the
agreement may be voidable by the affected party, even though the contract may
initially appear valid.
The key
distinction between a void contract and a voidable contract is that while a
void contract is unenforceable from the beginning, a voidable contract remains
enforceable until the party with the right to void it chooses to exercise that
right. If the party decides not to void the contract, it remains valid and can
be enforced by either party. However, if the party decides to void the
contract, it will have no further legal effect, and the party may be entitled
to remedies such as rescission, restitution, or damages.
Essential Elements of a Valid Contract
To understand how
void and voidable contracts differ from a valid contract, it is essential to
first review the elements that must be present for a contract to be legally
binding and enforceable. These essential elements are:
1.
Offer and
Acceptance The first element
required for a valid contract is an offer, made by one party, which is accepted
by the other party. The offer must be clear, definite, and communicated to the
offeree. Once the offer is made, the offeree must unequivocally accept it, and
acceptance must mirror the terms of the offer without any modifications or
conditions. If the offeree introduces new terms or conditions, it is considered
a counteroffer, not an acceptance.
2.
Intention
to Create Legal Relations For a
contract to be valid, both parties must intend to create a legally binding
agreement. This intention is typically assumed in commercial agreements and
business contracts, as parties generally enter into contracts with the
expectation that they will be enforceable by law. However, in informal
agreements, such as those made between family members or friends, there may not
be an intention to create legal relations, and such agreements may not be
considered enforceable contracts.
3.
Consideration Consideration refers to something of value that is
exchanged between the parties. Each party must give something in return for the
other party’s promise or performance. This could be money, goods, services, or
a promise to do (or refrain from doing) something. Consideration is what
distinguishes a contract from a mere gift. Without consideration, a contract is
generally unenforceable.
4.
Capacity The parties entering into the contract must have the
legal capacity to do so. This means they must be of the legal age (usually 18
or older) and mentally competent to understand the nature and consequences of
the agreement. Contracts made by minors, mentally incapacitated individuals, or
individuals who are intoxicated may be voidable depending on the circumstances.
5.
Consent Consent refers to the agreement of both parties to
the terms of the contract, which must be freely given. Consent cannot be
obtained through fraud, duress, undue influence, or misrepresentation. If one
party is coerced or deceived into entering the contract, the contract may be
voidable at the discretion of the wronged party. It is also important that both
parties are free to make their own decisions and are not under any kind of
pressure or manipulation that would invalidate their consent.
6.
Legality
of Purpose The subject matter of
the contract must be legal. A contract for an illegal purpose, such as selling
drugs or engaging in fraudulent activities, is considered void. A contract that
violates public policy, such as a contract that encourages discrimination or
violates the rights of others, is also void. A contract that involves illegal
activities is unenforceable, and courts will not assist in enforcing such
agreements.
7.
Possibility
of Performance The terms of the
contract must be possible to perform. If the contract is based on something
impossible to achieve, such as performing a task that is beyond human
capability or requiring someone to do something that is physically or legally
impossible, the contract is considered void. For instance, a contract that
requires a party to travel faster than the speed of light would be considered
impossible to perform.
Conclusion
In summary, while
both void and voidable contracts are not fully enforceable under certain
conditions, they differ significantly in terms of their validity and the rights
they confer on the parties involved. A void contract is one
that is unenforceable from the outset due to a fundamental flaw, such as
illegal subject matter or lack of capacity. A voidable contract,
on the other hand, is initially valid but can be canceled or rescinded by one
of the parties due to factors like duress, fraud, or lack of capacity.
For a contract to
be valid and enforceable, it must contain essential elements such as offer and
acceptance, intention to create legal relations, consideration, capacity,
consent, legality of purpose, and the possibility of performance. If any of
these elements are missing or flawed, the contract may be void or voidable,
depending on the specific circumstances.
Understanding the
distinctions between void and voidable contracts, as well as the essential
elements of a valid contract, is crucial for ensuring that agreements are
legally sound and enforceable.
0 comments:
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.