How did Mahatma Gandhi contribute to language learning in India?

Q.  How did Mahatma Gandhi contribute to language learning in India?

Gandhi's profound understanding of the intricate relationship between language, identity, and nationhood led him to dedicate significant efforts and launch various initiatives aimed at evolving a national language for India.

He recognized that a common language could serve as a powerful unifying force, bridging the linguistic diversity of the subcontinent and fostering a shared sense of national consciousness crucial for the success of the independence movement and the building of a cohesive nation. His vision for a national language was deeply intertwined with his broader socio-political philosophy, emphasizing inclusivity, simplicity, and the empowerment of the masses.  

Gandhi's engagement with the question of a national language evolved over time, shaped by his experiences, observations, and his growing understanding of the complexities of Indian society. Initially, influenced by the intellectual climate of his time and his exposure to English education, he did not immediately prioritize the issue of a national language. However, his experiences in South Africa, where he witnessed the unifying power of Gujarati among the Indian diaspora and the challenges posed by linguistic barriers, began to shape his thinking. Upon his return to India, his direct engagement with the diverse linguistic landscape of the country further solidified his conviction that a common language was essential for national integration and mass mobilization.  

Gandhi's approach to the national language question was characterized by several key principles:

1.     Inclusivity and Accessibility: He believed that the national language should be one that could be easily understood and adopted by the vast majority of the Indian population. He was wary of imposing a language that was primarily the domain of a select elite, as this would perpetuate existing social and educational inequalities. His emphasis was on a language that could facilitate communication between people from different linguistic regions and empower the common person.  

2.     Simplicity and Ease of Learning: Gandhi advocated for a language that was relatively simple in its grammar and vocabulary, making it easier for non-native speakers to learn and use. He believed that a complex or highly Sanskritized language would create barriers to wider adoption and hinder mass participation in national life.  

3.     Indigenous Origin and Cultural Rootedness: He strongly felt that the national language should have its roots in the Indian soil, reflecting the cultural heritage and linguistic traditions of the country. He was critical of the dominance of English, which he saw as a symbol of colonial rule and a language that alienated the masses from their own cultural moorings.  

4.     Potential for National Unity: For Gandhi, the primary purpose of a national language was to foster a sense of unity and common identity among the diverse linguistic groups in India. He envisioned a language that could serve as a medium for national discourse, facilitating communication, understanding, and a shared sense of belonging.

5.     Gradual Evolution and Consensus: He believed that the evolution of a national language should be a gradual process, based on consensus and the natural convergence of existing languages. He was against the forceful imposition of any single language, recognizing the sensitivities and potential for conflict in such an approach.

Based on these principles, Gandhi championed Hindustani as the most suitable candidate for the national language of India. Hindustani, a lingua franca that had evolved through centuries of interaction between Hindi and Urdu speakers, was widely spoken and understood in large parts of northern and central India. It possessed a relatively simple grammar and a vocabulary that drew from both Sanskrit and Persian-Arabic sources, making it accessible to a broad spectrum of the population.  

Gandhi actively promoted Hindustani through various initiatives:  

• Advocacy in the Nationalist Movement: He consistently used Hindustani in his speeches, writings, and interactions with the public during the independence movement. He encouraged other leaders and activists to do the same, recognizing its potential to reach a wider audience and mobilize the masses. His powerful oratory in Hindustani played a significant role in connecting with people across linguistic divides and fostering a sense of national unity.
• Establishment of Educational Institutions: Gandhi supported the establishment of educational institutions that promoted the teaching and learning of Hindustani. He believed that integrating Hindustani into the education system was crucial for its wider adoption and for creating a generation fluent in the common language. Institutions like the Gujarat Vidyapith, founded by Gandhi, emphasized the importance of learning Hindustani alongside regional languages.  
• Promotion through Publications and Media: He encouraged the publication of newspapers, journals, and other literature in Hindustani to facilitate communication and the dissemination of nationalistic ideas. He recognized the power of the media in shaping public opinion and promoting the use of a common language.  
• Emphasis on the Devanagari and Perso-Arabic Scripts: Gandhi advocated for the acceptance of both the Devanagari script (used for Hindi) and the Perso-Arabic script (used for Urdu) for writing Hindustani. This was a conscious effort to bridge the gap between Hindi and Urdu speakers and to promote a more inclusive vision of the national language. He believed that accepting both scripts would make Hindustani more accessible to a larger population and prevent linguistic chauvinism.  
• Formation of Language Organizations: Gandhi supported the formation of organizations dedicated to the promotion and development of Hindustani. These organizations worked to standardize the language, develop educational materials, and popularize its use in various spheres of public life.

Gandhi's vision for Hindustani as the national language was not without its challenges and encountered significant opposition. The movement for Hindi as the sole national language gained momentum, particularly among some sections of the Hindu nationalist movement. They argued for the adoption of a more Sanskritized Hindi written in the Devanagari script, viewing it as a more authentic representation of Indian culture and heritage. This perspective often clashed with Gandhi's inclusive vision of Hindustani, which sought to accommodate both Hindi and Urdu traditions.  

The Hindi-Urdu controversy, with its historical and religious undertones, posed a major obstacle to Gandhi's efforts. While Hindustani aimed to bridge this divide, the political climate and the growing assertion of distinct linguistic identities made it difficult to achieve a consensus. The partition of India in 1947 further complicated the issue, with Urdu becoming the national language of Pakistan.

Despite these challenges, Gandhi's advocacy for Hindustani left a lasting impact on the discourse surrounding the national language question in India. His emphasis on inclusivity, simplicity, and the importance of a language rooted in the common vernacular continues to resonate with many who believe in linguistic harmony and the empowerment of the masses.

However, the post-independence era saw Hindi being adopted as the official language of the Union government, with English as an additional official language for a limited period. This decision, while reflecting the numerical strength of Hindi speakers, did not fully align with Gandhi's vision of a truly national language that could be embraced by all sections of the population. The issue of language continues to be a sensitive and complex one in India, with ongoing debates about the role of Hindi, English, and regional languages in national life.  

In conclusion, Gandhi's efforts and initiatives towards evolving a national language for India were driven by his deep commitment to national unity, social inclusivity, and the empowerment of the masses. He championed Hindustani as the most suitable candidate, emphasizing its accessibility, simplicity, indigenous roots, and potential to bridge linguistic divides. Through his advocacy, his support for educational institutions and publications, and his emphasis on both the Devanagari and Perso-Arabic scripts, he sought to promote Hindustani as a common medium of communication and a symbol of national identity. While his vision faced challenges and did not fully materialize in the post-independence era, his principles of inclusivity and consensus continue to be relevant in the ongoing search for linguistic harmony and national integration in India. His efforts laid a significant foundation for the discussions and debates that continue to shape the linguistic landscape of the nation.  

• Tweet
• Share
• Share
• Share