Had it not been for the Puritans, the approach of the world to American Drama would have been different – discuss.

 Q. Had it not been for the Puritans, the approach of the world to American Drama would have been different – discuss.

The Puritans played a significant, often controversial role in shaping the cultural and intellectual landscape of early America, including its dramatic traditions. Their impact on American drama, while not immediately evident in the form of a distinct dramatic tradition, had profound and long-lasting effects on how theatre developed in the United States, particularly in the context of Puritanical moral and religious values. To understand how American drama might have evolved differently had it not been for the Puritans, it is essential to consider their attitudes toward theatre, culture, and the moral imperatives they imposed on early American society, as well as how these influences shaped the trajectory of drama in America in subsequent centuries.

The Puritans were a group of religious reformers who sought to "purify" the Church of England and believed that both religious and secular life should be based on strict interpretations of the Bible. They viewed entertainment, including theatre, with suspicion, associating it with sin, moral corruption, and idleness. In their view, theatre was a distraction from spiritual matters and an inappropriate use of time. This Puritanical condemnation of theatre and other forms of popular entertainment had significant repercussions for the development of dramatic arts in colonial America. The early colonists, especially in New England, were under the influence of Puritanical ideology, which led to the suppression of theatre and dramatic performances in the early years of the colony. Puritans saw theatre not just as an indulgence in frivolous entertainment but as a dangerous, subversive force that threatened the moral and religious order of society.

Had it not been for the Puritans and their strict moral code, American drama might have developed in a vastly different manner. The absence of Puritanical influence might have allowed for a more open, unrestrained theatrical culture to emerge, much earlier than it actually did. In societies where theatre flourished, such as in England and France, drama developed as a central part of the cultural landscape, often serving as a platform for political, social, and intellectual discourse. In contrast, the Puritans’ disdain for theatre stifled its growth in the American colonies, and it took much longer for theatre to establish itself as an important cultural and artistic form in the New World.


In the early years of American colonization, the Puritans not only discouraged the performance of plays but also enacted laws that prohibited theatrical performances. One of the most notable examples of this was the ban on theatre in Massachusetts in the mid-17th century. Puritans, such as the influential minister Increase Mather, argued that theatre was immoral because it involved deception and encouraged sinful behaviors. The Puritanical stance on theatre reflected their broader approach to life, which sought to limit distractions from the pursuit of spiritual salvation. As a result, theatre was virtually nonexistent in New England for many years, and any theatrical performances that did occur were often clandestine and met with disapproval from Puritan authorities.

This early hostility toward theatre had lasting effects on the development of American drama. It led to a deep-rooted suspicion of theatre and the dramatic arts in much of American society, particularly in the early centuries of the country's existence. While theatre was not completely absent in the American colonies, the Puritans' condemnation of it created an atmosphere in which drama was relegated to the periphery of cultural life. The Puritans’ hostility toward theatre meant that drama did not develop in the same organic way it did in other parts of the world. In Europe, drama was seen as a vital part of cultural and intellectual life, and playwrights such as William Shakespeare, Molière, and Voltaire contributed to a rich tradition of dramatic writing. In contrast, American theatre was often seen as a subversive or immoral activity, and playwrights had to contend with both societal disdain and legal restrictions in order to practice their craft.

Had the Puritans not been so influential in the development of early American society, the trajectory of American drama might have been more closely aligned with that of other Western nations. The Puritans' influence delayed the flourishing of drama as a serious art form in America and contributed to the lack of a distinct American dramatic tradition in the colonial period. Without the Puritan opposition to theatre, the American colonies may have developed a more robust theatrical culture, where drama could have emerged earlier as a reflection of societal issues and a platform for artistic and political expression.

However, the Puritans’ opposition to theatre did not entirely eliminate its presence in early America. While the dominant Puritan ideology sought to suppress theatre, there were pockets of resistance and moments of theatrical expression that persisted despite the prohibitions. Theatres in places like New York and Charleston began to emerge in the late 17th and early 18th centuries, albeit in a limited and sometimes secretive manner. These early theatres were often met with hostility from Puritan authorities, but they also served as a precursor to the development of a more vibrant theatrical culture in the United States. Over time, as American society became more diverse and less dominated by Puritanical values, theatre began to gain acceptance and develop its own unique voice.

The long-term effect of Puritan opposition to theatre can be seen in the way that American drama took on a distinct character in the 19th and 20th centuries. As the United States developed, drama became an important means of exploring American identity, particularly in relation to issues such as freedom, democracy, and the tension between individualism and social responsibility. American playwrights such as Eugene O'Neill, Tennessee Williams, Arthur Miller, and Lorraine Hansberry used theatre to address complex issues such as social justice, the American Dream, racial inequality, and the human condition. However, even as American drama became more prominent in the 20th century, the lingering influence of Puritanical values was still present. In particular, American theatre’s focus on morality, personal responsibility, and social conscience can be seen as a reflection of the Puritan legacy, even as American drama moved away from the Puritanical rejection of theatre as a whole.

The Puritans’ approach to theatre also shaped the way American drama was received and understood by its audiences. The Puritan suspicion of theatre meant that theatre was often viewed with skepticism, if not outright hostility, by many segments of American society. This created a tension between the artistic potential of theatre and the moral and religious values that underpinned American culture. In some ways, American drama has always had to navigate this tension, finding a balance between artistic expression and moral responsibility. The Puritans’ moral code, which emphasized the importance of personal virtue and social order, contributed to the development of an American theatre that was often concerned with issues of morality, ethics, and the pursuit of the greater good.

Another significant consequence of the Puritan legacy is the way it shaped the development of American theatre’s moral and religious themes. In contrast to the more secular and worldly concerns of European theatre, American drama, especially in its early years, often grappled with moral dilemmas, religious questions, and the search for spiritual meaning. This emphasis on morality and religion can be traced directly to the Puritan influence, which saw theatre as an avenue for promoting moral behavior and religious values. Even as American theatre evolved and diversified, these moral and religious concerns continued to resonate in the works of American playwrights. For example, the plays of Arthur Miller, such as The Crucible, which explores the Salem witch trials, are heavily influenced by the moralistic and religiously charged atmosphere that the Puritans created in colonial America. Miller’s work can be seen as a critique of the Puritanical legacy, particularly in its exploration of the dangers of mass hysteria, religious zealotry, and moral absolutism.

Had it not been for the Puritans and their suppression of theatre, it is possible that American drama would have developed in a less restrictive environment, allowing for a greater diversity of voices and ideas to emerge. In the absence of Puritanical influence, American theatre may have followed a path similar to that of other Western traditions, with drama becoming a more open space for experimentation, political critique, and the exploration of human nature. The Puritans’ strict moral code, however, ensured that American theatre remained, at least for a time, deeply entwined with questions of morality, religion, and social order.

In conclusion, the Puritans played a pivotal role in shaping the trajectory of American drama, not by contributing directly to its development but by imposing a moral and religious framework that deeply influenced the way theatre was perceived, received, and practiced in early America. Had it not been for the Puritans, American drama may have emerged more quickly and with fewer restrictions, potentially aligning more closely with European dramatic traditions. The Puritans’ suppression of theatre left a lasting legacy on the development of American drama, which grappled with moral and religious themes for centuries. Ultimately, the Puritanical opposition to theatre and its subsequent gradual acceptance in American society shaped the form, content, and reception of American drama, leaving an indelible mark on its evolution.

0 comments:

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.