Discuss William Dean Howell’s ‘Self Sacrifice’ as a Farce.

 Q. Discuss William Dean Howell’s ‘Self Sacrifice’ as a Farce.

William Dean Howells’ play Self-Sacrifice (1887) is often considered a key work in his exploration of the complexities of human nature and social ideals, yet it can also be analyzed through the lens of farce, a genre that thrives on exaggerated situations, absurdity, and comedic misunderstandings. Farce, as a theatrical form, is rooted in humor and often involves improbable situations, exaggerated characters, and a fast-paced plot that is designed to elicit laughter. While Howells' play is not a farce in the traditional sense of the word, it does exhibit many of the characteristics that align it with this comedic genre, notably in its portrayal of human follies, misunderstandings, and exaggerated situations.

To explore Self-Sacrifice as a farce, it is important first to understand the characteristics and origins of farce as a dramatic genre. Farce originated in medieval European theatre, where it was used as a comedic interlude between more serious plays. By the 17th and 18th centuries, it had evolved into a distinct genre, characterized by exaggerated action, improbable plot twists, and slapstick humor. The farcical elements in these plays often involve mistaken identities, misunderstandings, and absurd scenarios that lead to a humorous resolution, typically ending in a form of social reconciliation or restoration of order. Farce also often emphasizes the discrepancy between appearances and reality, with characters being trapped in their own misguided perceptions of themselves or others, resulting in comedic chaos.

William Dean Howells, known for his realistic portrayals of American society, particularly in his novels and plays, often focused on the moral complexities of human life and the social constraints that shaped individuals' actions. However, in Self-Sacrifice, Howells plays with the conventions of farce to critique the social and moral codes of his time. The play centers around a man, William, who is willing to sacrifice his own happiness for the well-being of others, particularly his fiancée. This apparent nobility of self-sacrifice, however, is complicated by a series of misunderstandings, exaggerated situations, and social expectations that lead to a comedic unraveling of the plot, making it a suitable subject for farcical analysis.

At the heart of Self-Sacrifice is the theme of moral idealism versus social reality, a concept that often serves as the foundation for farce. The main character, William, is a man whose sense of duty and sacrifice leads him to believe that he must abandon his personal happiness for the sake of others. This sense of moral superiority, which initially seems noble, becomes the catalyst for a series of absurd situations. The comedic tension in the play arises from the way in which William’s attempts at self-sacrifice are misinterpreted by the other characters, and the audience’s awareness of the absurdity of his actions creates a sense of dramatic irony. The situations that arise from these misunderstandings are typical of the farcical genre, where characters’ misguided motivations lead to comedic chaos.

The exaggerated nature of the characters in Self-Sacrifice also lends itself to a farcical reading. Farce often involves characters who are larger-than-life figures, defined by their exaggerated traits and behaviors. In Self-Sacrifice, William’s excessive sense of duty and moral righteousness is portrayed in an exaggerated manner, making him a caricature of the idealistic, self-sacrificing hero. His fiancée, who is portrayed as somewhat naive and unaware of his true feelings, also fits the mold of a farcical character. She misunderstands William’s actions and motivations, which leads to a series of comical situations. The play’s other characters, including those who serve as foils to William’s self-sacrifice, also exhibit exaggerated qualities that create comedic friction. These larger-than-life characters, who are defined by their moral or social failings, further the farcical tone of the play.

Another key characteristic of farce is the rapid pace of the plot and the use of mistaken identities or misunderstandings to drive the action forward. Self-Sacrifice contains elements of this fast-paced, confusion-driven structure. The play’s plot revolves around the misunderstanding of William’s self-sacrificial actions and the subsequent efforts of the other characters to resolve the situation. The comedic tension increases as these misunderstandings accumulate, leading to a climax in which the characters’ motivations and actions are revealed to be based on flawed perceptions of reality. The rapid escalation of these misunderstandings and the absurdity of the characters’ responses to them are hallmarks of farce, where the plot moves quickly and the characters are caught in a series of escalating, often ridiculous situations.

One of the defining features of farce is the way it plays with social conventions and exposes the absurdities of societal expectations. Self-Sacrifice critiques the social norms surrounding self-sacrifice, duty, and romantic relationships, which were particularly important themes in 19th-century American society. The play’s treatment of William’s moral idealism exposes the rigidity of these social expectations, as his willingness to sacrifice his own happiness is shown to be based on misguided assumptions about duty and love. In a farce, social conventions are often turned upside down, with characters either rebelling against or being trapped by these norms. In Self-Sacrifice, the exaggerated social conventions surrounding self-sacrifice and morality become the basis for the play’s comedic situations, as the characters’ adherence to these conventions leads them into absurd and farcical predicaments.

The use of dramatic irony in Self-Sacrifice also contributes to its farcical nature. Farce often relies on dramatic irony, where the audience is aware of the true nature of a situation while the characters are not. In Self-Sacrifice, the audience understands that William’s actions are based on a misinterpretation of his role in the social order, but the other characters are oblivious to this fact. This creates a sense of humor, as the characters’ actions are increasingly absurd in light of the audience’s awareness of the situation. The dramatic irony builds as the plot progresses, with each character’s misunderstanding of the situation contributing to the farcical nature of the play. William’s attempts to be noble and self-sacrificial are repeatedly thwarted by the actions of the other characters, and the audience’s awareness of the absurdity of his situation enhances the comic effect.

The resolution of the play, in which the misunderstandings are cleared up and order is restored, is also a characteristic of farce. In typical farcical fashion, the play ends with a return to social harmony, albeit after a series of comedic complications. In Self-Sacrifice, the eventual resolution comes when the characters recognize the absurdity of the situation and understand the true motivations behind William’s actions. This return to order, after a period of comedic chaos, is a common feature of farce, in which the disruption of social norms is followed by a restoration of equilibrium. The final resolution of the play, in which the characters come to terms with the misunderstandings and William’s self-sacrifice is no longer required, reflects the farcical notion that societal expectations, when taken to extremes, are both unrealistic and unnecessary.

Despite the many farcical elements present in Self-Sacrifice, it is important to note that the play also contains elements of realism, which is characteristic of Howells’ broader body of work. Howells is known for his exploration of social issues and the moral dilemmas faced by individuals in a rapidly changing society. In Self-Sacrifice, the play’s treatment of moral ideals, self-sacrifice, and social expectations reflects the influence of realism, as the characters grapple with issues that are deeply rooted in the social fabric of the time. The play’s comedic treatment of these issues, however, shifts it toward the farcical genre, where the exaggerated portrayal of characters and situations serves to highlight the absurdity of their actions.

In conclusion, William Dean Howells’ Self-Sacrifice can be analyzed as a farce due to its use of exaggerated characters, improbable situations, misunderstandings, and social critique. The play’s focus on the absurdity of moral idealism, its fast-paced plot, and the dramatic irony that permeates the narrative are all hallmarks of farce. While Howells’ work is often associated with realism, Self-Sacrifice demonstrates his ability to blend elements of farce with his exploration of social and moral issues. By using the conventions of farce, Howells critiques the societal expectations surrounding self-sacrifice and duty, exposing the flaws and contradictions inherent in these ideals. Ultimately, Self-Sacrifice is a comedic exploration of human folly and the complexities of social and moral expectations, making it a noteworthy example of Howells’ versatility as a playwright.

0 comments:

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.