Q. Categorize the ‘Great’ and ‘Little’ traditions in the study of folklore.
In the field of folklore studies, the concepts of the "Great
Tradition" and the "Little Tradition" are important analytical
frameworks used to understand the relationship between high culture (elite
traditions) and popular culture (folk traditions). These categories were first
formulated by the American folklorist Robert Redfield in the mid-20th century,
though they have since been developed and debated by scholars across various
disciplines. The "Great Tradition" typically refers to the learned,
institutionalized, and formal cultural practices associated with the elite or
educated classes, while the "Little Tradition" pertains to the
everyday cultural practices of the common people, often transmitted orally and
rooted in local customs, beliefs, and practices. These distinctions provide a
useful lens for analyzing the ways in which cultures evolve, the interplay
between different social strata, and the processes by which traditions are
maintained, transformed, or discarded over time.
In contrast, the "Little Tradition" refers to the customs,
beliefs, rituals, and cultural practices that arise from the everyday lives of
ordinary people. This tradition is typically passed down orally and is less
formalized than the Great Tradition. The Little Tradition is often
characterized by its emphasis on local knowledge, folk beliefs, popular
religious practices, storytelling, and communal rituals. The term "Little
Tradition" suggests a more decentralized, flexible, and dynamic form of
culture, one that is often shaped by the immediate needs and experiences of the
community rather than by the formal dictates of the elite. Examples of Little
Traditions might include local folktales, songs, dances, festivals,
superstitions, and informal religious practices that are often not written down
but are passed through generations by word of mouth. These traditions are
deeply rooted in the everyday lives of people and are often characterized by
their adaptability and resilience in the face of social and cultural change.
While the distinctions between Great and Little Traditions are useful for analytical purposes, it is important to recognize that these categories are not rigid or mutually exclusive. In practice, the boundaries between the two traditions are often fluid, with elements of the Little Tradition influencing and being incorporated into the Great Tradition, and vice versa. This interaction between the two traditions is especially evident in cultures where oral traditions, popular beliefs, and communal practices have been preserved alongside more formalized forms of cultural expression. In many cases, elements of the Little Tradition are "elevated" to the status of the Great Tradition, as when folk songs or stories are collected and written down, or when popular religious practices are incorporated into official religious rituals. Similarly, elements of the Great Tradition may be absorbed into the Little Tradition as people adapt and reinterpret elite cultural forms to suit their own needs and circumstances.
One of the key points of tension between the Great and Little
Traditions is the issue of authority. The Great Tradition is often associated
with the establishment of cultural norms and values, with the intellectual and
political elite exerting control over what is considered "authentic"
or "legitimate" culture. The Little Tradition, on the other hand, is
often seen as a more egalitarian form of culture, one that is shaped by the
collective wisdom and experiences of the people rather than by a small,
powerful group. This tension between the official and unofficial, the elite and
the popular, is a central theme in the study of folklore and cultural history.
Scholars of folklore often examine how the two traditions interact, overlap,
and influence each other, as well as how social, political, and historical forces
shape the production and transmission of cultural practices.
In examining the relationship between the Great and Little Traditions,
scholars of folklore have also explored the role of change and continuity in
cultural practices. The Little Tradition is often seen as more dynamic and
fluid, capable of adapting to new circumstances and responding to the changing
needs and concerns of the community. For example, folk songs may evolve over
time, incorporating new themes or reflecting current social or political
issues. The Little Tradition may also serve as a repository for collective
memory, preserving the history, values, and beliefs of a community in ways that
are not always captured by the written record. In contrast, the Great Tradition
tends to be more static and institutionalized, with its core texts and
practices being preserved and transmitted through formal education and
institutions. However, even the Great Tradition is not immune to change, as new
interpretations, adaptations, and critiques emerge over time, particularly in
the face of cultural and social movements.
In some cases, the Great Tradition may attempt to suppress or
marginalize the Little Tradition, particularly when the popular practices or
beliefs of ordinary people are seen as a threat to the dominant cultural or
religious order. For example, in many colonial contexts, the cultural practices
of indigenous peoples were suppressed by colonial authorities in favor of
Western cultural norms and values. Similarly, in religious contexts, the folk
beliefs and practices of the common people were often viewed as heretical or
unorthodox by the institutionalized clergy. In such cases, the Little Tradition
may be forced underground or transformed into something that conforms to the
expectations of the elite. Despite these efforts to suppress it, the Little
Tradition often survives in subtle and creative ways, as people continue to
practice and adapt their cultural forms in private or in ways that challenge
the dominant cultural narrative.
At the same time, the study of folklore has also highlighted the ways
in which the Great Tradition can be reshaped by the contributions of the Little
Tradition. In many instances, elements of popular culture, folk beliefs, and
vernacular traditions have been integrated into the Great Tradition, often in
ways that reflect broader social and cultural shifts. For example, folk
stories, songs, and rituals may be collected and canonized by scholars or
religious leaders, giving them a new status within the formalized cultural
system. The process of "elevating" the Little Tradition to the level
of the Great Tradition is often a complex and contested one, as different
social, political, and cultural groups vie for control over the production and
transmission of cultural knowledge. Nonetheless, this process of exchange and
transformation helps to blur the lines between the elite and the popular, the
formal and the informal, and the written and the oral.
In contemporary society, the distinction between the Great and Little
Traditions has become increasingly complex, as globalization, mass media, and
technological advancements have transformed the ways in which culture is
produced, consumed, and transmitted. The rise of digital technologies, for
example, has made it easier for elements of the Little Tradition to be
disseminated on a global scale, as people from different cultures share their
stories, songs, and practices online. This has created new opportunities for
cultural exchange and interaction, as well as for the democratization of
cultural production. At the same time, the commercialization of culture has led
to the commodification of both elite and popular cultural forms, with the
boundaries between the two becoming more fluid and porous. In this context, the
study of folklore continues to evolve, as scholars examine how the interplay
between the Great and Little Traditions shapes the ways in which culture is
produced, transmitted, and experienced in the contemporary world.
In conclusion, the concepts of the "Great Tradition" and the
"Little Tradition" provide valuable frameworks for understanding the
complexities of cultural production and transmission. While the Great Tradition
is associated with formal, institutionalized forms of culture and knowledge,
the Little Tradition reflects the everyday practices and beliefs of ordinary
people. These categories are not rigid or fixed, but rather fluid and dynamic,
with elements of the Little Tradition influencing and being incorporated into
the Great Tradition, and vice versa. The relationship between the two
traditions is shaped by social, political, and historical forces, and the study
of folklore offers important insights into how cultural practices evolve,
adapt, and survive over time. As society continues to change, the boundaries
between the Great and Little Traditions will likely continue to shift, creating
new opportunities for cultural exchange, transformation, and innovation.
Through the study of folklore, we gain a deeper understanding of the ways in
which culture shapes our identities, values, and beliefs, and how it continues
to evolve in response to the challenges and opportunities of the modern world.
0 comments:
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.