Anthropological research during the Second World War was fraught with ethical concerns, particularly with regard to the treatment of human subjects. In many cases, anthropologists were called upon to conduct research for military purposes, and the pressure to produce results quickly often led to ethical compromises.
Discuss ethics in
anthropological research during the 2nd World War
One of the most
egregious examples of unethical anthropological research during the Second
World War was the work of Nazi scientists, who used anthropology to support
their ideology of racial superiority. Nazi anthropologists used the tools of
their discipline to classify people according to racial categories and to
justify the persecution and genocide of Jews, Romani people, and other groups
deemed undesirable by the Nazi regime.
In the United States,
anthropologists were also involved in military research, although their work
was generally less overtly political. Anthropologists working for the
government were tasked with studying the culture and language of enemy groups
in order to gain strategic advantages in warfare. However, the research methods
used by these anthropologists were often highly invasive, and many subjects
were not informed of the purpose of the research or given the opportunity to
consent to their participation.
There were also
ethical concerns surrounding the collection of human remains and artifacts by
anthropologists during the Second World War. Some anthropologists were involved
in the looting of cultural artifacts from occupied territories, which was not
only unethical but also illegal under international law. In some cases, human
remains were also taken from these territories without proper consent or
respect for local customs and beliefs.
In the decades
since the Second World War, anthropologists have grappled with the ethical
implications of their discipline's involvement in military research and the
exploitation of human subjects. The American Anthropological Association (AAA)
has developed a code of ethics to guide anthropological research and practice,
which emphasizes informed consent, respect for cultural diversity, and the
responsibility of anthropologists to use their skills and knowledge for the
public good. However, debates about the role of anthropology in military and
intelligence operations continue to this day, highlighting the ongoing need for
critical reflection and ethical awareness within the discipline.
For SOLVED PDF & Handwritten
WhatsApp No :- 7838475019
During
the Second World War, research was conducted in various fields to support
military efforts and gain strategic advantages. Some of the areas of research
during this time period included:
1.
Weapons development: Research was conducted to develop
new and more effective weapons, such as atomic bombs, rockets, and radar
technology.
2.
Medicine: Medical research during the war focused on
developing new treatments for injuries and diseases that were common among
soldiers, as well as improving techniques for surgery and blood transfusions.
3.
Psychology: Research was conducted on the psychological
effects of combat, including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and other
mental health issues that soldiers experienced during and after the war.
4.
Linguistics and anthropology: Linguists and
anthropologists were employed to study the language and culture of enemy
groups, with the aim of gaining a strategic advantage in warfare.
5.
Intelligence gathering: Intelligence agencies conducted
research to gather information on enemy movements, plans, and capabilities.
6.
Geography: Geographical research was used to develop
maps and to study the terrain and climate of battlefields.
7.
Agriculture: Research was conducted to improve food
production and distribution, as well as to develop new technologies for
farming.
Overall,
research during the Second World War was heavily focused on supporting the war
effort, with many scientists and researchers working closely with military and
government agencies. However, there were also ethical concerns surrounding some
of the research conducted during this time, particularly with regard to the
treatment of human subjects and the exploitation of local populations. These
issues continue to be debated and examined by researchers and scholars today.
0 comments:
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.