The Guest Novel summary and themes

 The Guest Novel summary and theme

Daru, a French schoolmaster born and raised in a remote, sparsely populated desert region in the Atlas Mountains of French colonial Algeria, glimpses a horseman and a pedestrian laboriously making their way towards his hillside schoolhouse as they traverse the plateau that meets the incline. In the distance, he makes out the horse’s strained breath in the frigid air as the beast stumbles on uneven stones covered with “a layer of dirty white snow” that has fallen during an unexpected October blizzard (65).

As Daru grabs a sweater from the schoolroom, he reflects on the previous eight-month drought, which has decimated what few crops could be cultivated in his region’s inhospitable soil and has killed off local livestock, as well as humans. Just three days earlier, after the interminably long stretch of blazing heat, the intense snowfall hit out of nowhere without even a light rainfall to announce the transition from one extreme meteorological event to another. Fortunately, the French administration regularly drops off food rations, which he in turn distributes to local families to keep them nourished.

His schoolroom, whose blackboard displays a drawing of France’s four rivers, is devoid of students due to the blizzard. Despite the simplicity of his lodging—the two-room structure houses both the school and his living quarters—the region’s treacherous conditions, and his monastic lifestyle, Daru feels “like a lord” compared to the impoverished, food insecure families scattered around the area (66).

Returning to his window to track the men’s progress, Daru makes out Balducci, an older Corsican police officer, on the horse, accompanied by an Arab prisoner in traditional regional garb with his head lowered and hands bound. When the men arrive, the schoolmaster welcomes them and prepares tea, in following with local custom. Upon extending a cup of tea to the prisoner, Daru displays discomfort at the Arab’s bound hands and requests permission from Balducci to untie them. The silent prisoner’s feverish, penetrating gaze fixes the schoolteacher’s eyes as the latter frees the Arab’s hands so that he can cold the cup of tea.

Once his visitors are settled, Daru inquires as to their destination; he appears perplexed when the gendarme indicates the schoolhouse. The latter further explains that he’ll be leaving promptly and that the schoolteacher is to escort the Arab to French authorities in Tinguit, the nearest town. Initially convinced that Balducci is joking, Daru asserts that transporting prisoners doesn’t fall into the purview of his job description. Retorting that “[i]n wartime people do all kinds of jobs” (67), the gendarme explains that, given the limited size of his staff, he must return to his post without delay. As Balducci repeats his official order—“It’s an order, son, and I repeat it” (69)—the schoolteacher bristles, emphatically refusing to acquiesce. A tense debate ensues between the men.

Asked for details about the Arab’s crime, Balducci claims that the man reportedly murdered his cousin during a squabble over grain, after which he was hidden by his fellow villagers prior to being apprehended by the police. The gendarme explains the urgency of the man’s transfer to Tinguit: His village is astir and wants to reclaim him. Daru also asks if the Arab—who doesn’t speak French—holds anti-French sentiment. The gendarme expresses doubt, adding that one can never know for sure. Voicing his disgust at the prisoner’s violent crime, Daru reiterates his refusal to adhere to orders, though he does concede to house the prisoner for the night. After some hesitation, Balducci decides that, rather than turn in Daru for insubordination, he’ll accept the latter’s signing a form stating that he has completed his assigned task of delivering the prisoner to the schoolhouse. At first, Daru resists signing the document, but he eventually complies.

Prior to leaving, Balducci moves to retie the Arab but is met with the schoolmaster’s resistance. Astonished at Daru’s resolve given that the prisoner could pose a threat to his security, Balducci asks if Daru owns a firearm, offering his revolver; unfazed, the schoolteacher replies that his shotgun is buried somewhere in a trunk. Finally, the insulted Balducci leaves in a huff.

With the gendarme gone, Daru orders the prisoner in Arabic to wait in the schoolroom while he goes to nap in his room, grabbing the revolver along the way. After resting, Daru hears nothing from the adjoining classroom and feels a surge of pure joy at the prospect that perhaps the Arab has escaped, thereby liberating him from having to decide the man’s fate. Alas, the immobile prisoner has remained in the spot where Daru left him.

As evening approaches, Daru fashions a makeshift bed for the Arab and begins supper preparations. The two men chat for the first time, with the Arab asking what will happen to him and if Daru is his judge. Surprised that Daru eats alongside him, the Arab confusedly answers a few simple questions about his crime as the two men settle down for the night. Feeling vulnerable and uncomfortable with the prisoner in his room, where he’s accustomed to being alone, Daru has trouble falling asleep. During the night, he hears the Arab stir as he makes his way outside. Again hoping that he’ll escape, Daru is disappointed when he realizes that the prisoner has simply gone outside to relieve himself.

In the morning, the rising sun begins to melt patches of snow on the ground. The Arab washes as Daru prepares a package of food for the journey. Initially refusing to budge, the man starts walking when the schoolmaster joins him. Daru thinks he hears noise from around the schoolhouse and briefly returns, not finding anybody. After two hours, the men come to a crossroads, where Daru offers the Arab food and some money, indicating the route to the police station in Tinguit towards the east as well as a southbound path leading to an area inhabited by Berbers who will welcome him and offer protection. Visibly agitated, the Arab attempts to speak but is silenced by Daru, who bids the man farewell and heads back to the schoolhouse.

the guest summary, the guest short story pdf, daru the guest character analysis, the guest, albert camus ending explained, the guest characters, discuss the theme of absurdness in the guest,,the guest albert camus symbols, the guest by saki summary

THE GUEST CHARACTER ANALYSIS

DARU

A short, husky Frenchman born and raised in a treacherously rugged and dry rural area of French colonial Algeria, Daru is a schoolmaster living alone in a rural hillside schoolhouse serving some 20 students. Surrounded by abject poverty and living “almost like a monk” in his one inelegant room attached to the classroom (66), the story’s protagonist nevertheless feels privileged in this inhospitable land of his upbringing, this place of belonging: “Everywhere else, he felt exiled” (66).

Ever compassionate, Daru regularly distributes food from stocks provided by the administration to surrounding villagers left hungry because of an eight-month drought. Similarly, Daru demonstrates kindheartedness towards the Arab prisoner delivered to him, not only in refusing to keep him bound by a rope—as the gendarme Balducci would have it—but also in preparing food and drink that he consumes alongside him in a gesture of equality. Resolute in his principles based on free will, Daru directly defies Balducci’s orders to deliver the Arab—accused of murder—to authorities in a nearby town. Though repulsed by the prisoner’s putative crime, he nonetheless offers the latter a stash of food, money, and a path to freedom because “to hand him over was contrary to honor” (72). Upon discovering that the Arab has rejected this option, Daru, puzzled by the man’s lack of agency and anxious because of the threat awaiting him on the chalkboard, feels vulnerable, despairing, and isolated.  

BALDUCCI

An older Corsican policeman with a bristling mustache, a sun-bronzed forehead, and small dark eyes, Balducci exhibits consideration towards the Arab prisoner he delivers to Daru, ensuring that his horse—upon which he rides, while the Arab walks alongside, arms bound—doesn’t move so quickly as to distress the man. Despite this small gesture of kindness, Balducci carries out his orders, thus serving as a foil to Daru’s character.

Confronted with the schoolmaster’s emphatic refusal to deliver the Arab to authorities in a nearby village, the gendarme fumes at his longtime acquaintance—whom he qualifies as “a little cracked” and likens to his son (68), repeatedly designating him as such—ultimately deciding not to turn in the schoolmaster as long as he signs a form stating that Balducci has completed his duty. Though he expresses distaste towards certain aspects of his job, this gendarme smelling strongly of horse and leather nevertheless meticulously adheres to established top-down procedures as they flow through the chain of command. 

THE ARAB

Unnamed throughout the story, the Arab prisoner, accused of killing his cousin during an altercation over grain, remains unresponsive during Balducci’s time with him despite the gendarme’s efforts to ensure his relative comfort during their journey through the dirty fallen snow to Daru’s schoolhouse. Struck by the Arab’s prominent “fat, smooth, almost Negroid” lips (67), dark, feverish eyes, and obstinate forehead, Daru, jarred when the man pulls down his hood and looks directly into his eyes, senses a rebellious temperament residing under the faded blue jellaba cloaking him.

Speaking sparingly and only upon Balducci’s departure, the Arab eventually grows attached to Daru—who, to his astonishment, cooks for and eats with him—begging him to accompany him to the police station the following day. When, during their expedition to Tinguit, Daru indicates two distinct paths—one to the prisoner’s expected destination and the other to a region inhabited by nomads who will take him in—the Arab, dumbfounded and irresolute, remains immobile as Daru leaves him at the crossroads, ultimately choosing the certainty of prison over the unknown.

THE GUEST THEMES

HUMAN ISOLATION IN AN INDIFFERENT UNIVERSE

From the story’s first paragraph onwards, isolation looms large as Daru, a solitary, unwed teacher in a sparsely populated area of Algeria, watches two men cross the snow-covered plateau that meets the hill on which the schoolhouse doubling as his residence lies. Given the unexpected onset of an unseasonal blizzard after eight months of brutal drought, Daru’s students have been absent; as he makes note of the travelers’ progress from his “empty, frigid classroom” (65), it becomes increasingly clear that, already alone in the vast, harsh terrain of his birth, Daru hasn’t seen a soul in at least a handful of days, when the last government food drop-off transpired.

The brutality of the terrain the protagonist calls home is mirrored in the sky above; while the travelers’ visit has been accompanied by a slight glimmer of light—a notable change from the darkness brought about by the snowstorm—Daru knows that, in keeping with its customary pattern, the melting snow will give way to scorching sun that will once again blaze the region’s stone-covered fields, the unchanging sky shedding “its dry light on the solitary expanse where nothing had any connection with man” (68).

The schoolmaster’s oxymoronic tête-à-tête with the omnipresent silence enveloping his existence occurs after his having resolutely defied Balducci’s order to deliver the prisoner to French authorities. Having wounded his longtime father figure, Daru is left in a sterile, indifferent realm, fully cognizant that: “No one in this desert, neither he nor his guest, mattered. And yet, outside this desert neither of them […] could have really lived” (70). His situation represents a classic example of the absurd, an element of Camus’s philosophy.

Trapped in this vacuum, Camus’s protagonist must confront his own moral code as it relates to the decision at hand—what to do with the Arab prisoner left with him—as well as to his own status vis-à-vis the colonial government. As a French citizen born in Algeria, Daru is the proverbial stranger in a strange land; inhospitable as it is, this wretched landscape is his home, and yet, imminent uprisings among indigenous Algerians suggest that French presence in—and control of—the country will not last long. Daru’s ethical predicament demands choice and action on his part. 

FREE WILL, EXISTENTIALISM, AND THE ABSURD

Daru’s dilemma stems from Camus’s stance towards human existence and individual responsibility. As a novelist, essayist, and philosopher living in Paris during and after World War II, Camus became part of—though later repudiated—the postwar existentialist cultural and philosophical movement, which places utmost significance in the freedom at the core of human existence. Deeming this individual freedom foundational in all other values, existentialism addresses facets of modern life that humans face, such as angst, boredom, isolation, nothingness, terror, and the absurd. With each person forced to confront these components of life—itself intrinsically absurd—the only option for the existentialist is to act at all costs.

In “The Guest,” all three characters must come to grips with tough decisions and their consequences. When Balducci delivers the Arab to Daru’s remote schoolhouse with orders that Daru house him for the night before handing him over to French authorities, Daru is confronted with his conscience, as well as with his role in society as a French citizen born in colonial Algeria, where his people have ruled for over a century. French law would dictate that he promptly transport the Arab to Tinguit, where “justice”—in the form of prison—awaits him. Despite this command, the schoolmaster, albeit thoroughly disgusted with the man’s purported crime, does not find it ethical to comply with an order whose automatic outcome would be incarceration. Instead, he would prefer that the Arab choose for himself, thereby exercising his own free will. Meanwhile, Balducci, having been commanded from above to leave the prisoner in Daru’s hands with orders that Daru take over the next step of the mission, finds himself confronted with the latter’s outright refusal to follow through beyond housing the Arab for the night. Upon hesitation, rather than turn in Daru, the gendarme forces him to sign a form certifying that he has delivered the Arab to the schoolhouse, thereby certifying that his step of the process has been fulfilled. Similarly, the prisoner, led by Daru to a crossroads and offered the freedom of electing one of two paths—one to certain imprisonment in Tinguit and the other to shelter among the region’s nomadic Berbers—chooses the road leading to apprehension by the French legal system.

All three characters butt heads with the absurd. Living in a hostile climate over which they have no control and among men “who didn’t help matters either” (66)—namely each other, all of whose choices will determine the Arab’s fate—they remain powerless in determining anything other than their own choices, which they must make. Despite the futility of their reality, however, they must choose and act, even with an indifferent sky looming above and parched, infertile land below.

HOSPITALITY VIEWED WITHIN THE COLONIAL FRAMEWORK

Rooted in the Latin term hospitalitis—itself derived from the word hospes, the word for “host” as well as “guest” or “stranger”—hospitality denotes welcoming visitors known and unknown and typically involves offering them food and shelter as well as anticipating their needs. As much today as in ancient times, attending to itinerant visitors’ comfort and well-being also implies providing them a safe temporary dwelling space with the potential benefit of turning enemies into friends.

For as long as human interaction has been documented, hospitality has figured as a salient element of society. Looking back as far as 15,000 BCE, Lascaux cave drawings in France display scenes of tribes hosting each other. Within the Judeo-Christian-Islamic tradition, Genesis 18’s tale of Abraham and Sarah providing generous hospitality to three visitors exemplifies this basic tenet of proper interpersonal conduct, which strengthens bonds among individuals, communities, and nations.

Within the context of Camus’s “The Guest,” the hospitality theme is announced by the story’s title, whose ambiguity stems from Latin source word of the French word “hôte.” In its most evident sense, the story’s protagonist, Daru, initially extends a warm welcome to both visitors—the gendarme, a longtime acquaintance, and the unknown Arab prisoner—who have trudged through harsh terrain and weather conditions to reach his schoolhouse. Although the schoolteacher resents the gendarme for commanding him to deliver the prisoner to French justice—which he refuses to do—as well as for forcing the latter’s presence on him, he nevertheless accepts the Arab’s visit, fashioning comfortable sleeping arrangements for his guest in his humble abode and offering him a meal.

Contrary to local practice, Daru even eats alongside the Arab, an act that the latter—a man of few words—remarks and questions. Daru’s simple but declarative act of human solidarity brings to the fore an element of his moral code, which, despite his superior status as part of the French colonial power in the region, prohibits him from handing over the Arab to justice under a legal system that’s not his own and, furthermore, that will consider him guilty until proven innocent.

ALSO READ:-

Solved Notes & Pdf

Whatsapp :- 8130208920

Youtube :- Myexamsolution

0 comments:

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.