What is MARC? Discuss the field „856‟ for description of online resources

 What is MARC? Discuss the field „856 for description of online resources

Field 856 in the 

MARC21 Information formats is used for electronic location and access information to an electronic resource and contains information related to the resource. The field may be used in a bibliographic or holdings record for a resource when that resource or a subset of it is available electronically.

A description of the full field is available in the MARC 21 Concise Format for Bibliographic Data, or in the full format, MARC 21 Format for Bibliographic Data, available from LC's (CDS). It is also available in the MARC 21 authority, holdings, classification and community information format documentation.

ALSO READ:-

 What is keyword indexing? Enumerate its different variants
information processing examples, information processing and retrieval pdf in library science, information processing and retrieval in library science mcq, what is information processing in information technology, information processing theory, information processing in psychology, importance of information processing, types of information processing

 What is MARC? Discuss the field „856 for description of online resources

Presentation

Field 856 in the MARC 21 bibliographic, possessions, authority, order, and local area data designs is utilized for electronic area and access data to an electronic asset.

The field might be utilized in a bibliographic or property record for an asset when it or a subset of it is accessible electronically. Likewise, it could be utilized to find and access an electronic rendition of a non-electronic asset depicted in either the bibliographic record, a piece of the asset portrayed, or a connected electronic asset. See the Field 856 in Different Configurations segment for data about how field 856 is utilized in the power, order, and local area data designs.

General Data

The information in field 856 might be a Uniform Asset Identifier (URI), which is kept in subfield $u. The fundamental finder data may likewise be parsed into isolated characterized subfields. Note that different subfields for finder information was given when this field was first settled in 1993, however by and large, these are only occasionally utilized. An entrance strategy, or convention utilized, is given as a worth in the principal marker position (in the event that the entrance technique is email, FTP, remote login (telnet), dial-up, or HTTP) or in subfield $2 (in the event that the entrance technique is anything more). The entrance technique is the main component of a URL. The field may likewise incorporate a Uniform Asset Name or URN (e.g., a DOI (Computerized Item Identifier) or handle).

See underneath for rules on repeatability.

What is MARC? Discuss the field „856 for description of online resources

Uniform Asset Identifier. For any entrance strategy, a Uniform Asset Identifier (URI) is for the most part kept in subfield $u. Separate subfields might be utilized on the off chance that showing information with a certain goal in mind is alluring.

The most regularly involved information components in field 856 are as per the following:

  • first pointer = 4 for HTTP (prior records might utilize clear)
  • Subfield $u = [HTTP URL]
  • Subfield $3: information determining to what the URI alludes, if relevant
  • Subfield $z (Public note): information connecting with the electronic area of the source that is satisfactory out there in the open

Required subfields. A URI in subfield $u is required except if electronic area and access data is parsed into discrete subfields, in which case no single subfield is required. While utilizing this strategy, the subfields utilized generally relies upon the entrance technique showed in the principal marker or in subfield $2 (if first pointer = 7).

Encoding non-MARC characters. In February 1994, Proposition 93-10 characterized extra characters in the MARC character set to both oblige existing bibliographic necessities and to adjust it to the ASCII and ANSEL character sets. Both the dividing highlight and the dispersing tilde were added at the time in light of the need in registry and document names for electronic assets. Numerous frameworks have executed these characters. For frameworks that poor person executed the separating highlight and tilde, the accompanying elective characters might be utilized:

  • separating highlight %5F
  • separating tilde %7E

What is MARC? Discuss the field „856 for description of online resources

Since these characters are legitimate ASCII strings, the above technique takes into consideration the usefulness upheld by Z39.50 clients and Internet browsers which grant clients to tap on connections to get to assets addressed by URLs. At the point when the increments to the MARC 21 person set are carried out to help the encoding of the dispersing characters, it will be feasible to supplant all examples of the %xx strings.

Various 856 fields. There are many motivations to remember various 856 fields for records. Coming up next are the most widely recognized:

Area information components change (the URI in subfield $u or subfields $a, $b, $d, when utilized)

Different access strategies (e.g., a record accessible through HTTP and from a FTP server)

Various pieces of the thing are electronic, utilizing subfield $3 to demonstrate the part (e.g., chapter by chapter guide open in one document and a theoretical in another)

Reflect destinations (a similar asset is made accessible at two unique areas, frequently to work with access, maybe globally)

Various arrangements/goals (e.g., the ASCII rendition of an electronic diary versus the Internet landing page for that diary; a thumbnail versus chronicled duplicate of a digitized photo)

Related things, utilizing subfield $3 and second marker worth to indicate

See additionally under subfield $u for repeatability rules.

What is MARC? Discuss the field „856 for description of online resources

Field 856 in bibliographic or possessions records. Since field 856 is legitimate in both bibliographic and possessions records, organizations might lean toward keep it in the property record. It is planned to be an electronic comparable to field 852 (Area), which contains data used to distinguish the holding association and other definite data expected to find an actual thing in an assortment. In mid 1999, the Organization Improvement and MARC Norms Office evoked suppositions on whether it is alluring to utilize the field in bibliographic or property records. Reactions got commonly preferred keep the field in the property record where viable. Nonetheless, for different reasons, for example, the more extensive trade of bibliographic records, numerous foundations utilize the bibliographic record regardless of the advantages of utilizing possessions records.

The accompanying benefits of utilizing property records have been communicated:

Possession to an electronic asset might fluctuate by organization. Such access data has a place in neighborhood possessions.

The possessions record is a way to unite different forms.

information processing examples, information processing and retrieval pdf in library science, information processing and retrieval in library science mcq, what is information processing in information technology, information processing theory, information processing in psychology, importance of information processing, types of information processing
Utilization of a solitary record approach for the bibliographic thing has been carried out broadly. This training makes it more clear to involve possessions for the particular renditions.

Having a hot-connected 856 field in property powers clients to consider it possessions data, and to isolate data about the general bibliographic thing.

The "widespread URL" that is for general access and any broad data on access in note fields ought to be in the bibliographic record. Explicit nearby access URLs ought to be in property (albeit this might bring about unusualness).

Bibliographic field 856 could conveniently be restricted to joins that don't make a difference to the whole bibliographic thing (e.g., tracking down help, chapter by chapter guide, unique).

To move towards this methodology later on, it will be important to convince merchants to roll out the accompanying improvements to their ILS frameworks:

  • Take into consideration hot connections from property records
  • Take into account the capacity to do interface checking from property records
  • Give ordering of property records
  • Consider the capacity to trade the fields from property, to be traded either as discrete possessions records or implanted in a sent out bibliographic record
  • Accommodate more intelligent presentations of bibliographic/property data where vital
  • Consider sequencing numerous possessions records
ALSO READ:-

 What is keyword indexing? Enumerate its different variants

0 comments:

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.