Examine Said’s definition of Orientalism. Do you find any flaws, or loop holes, in his argument
Edward Said's definition of Orientalism, as outlined in his
book "Orientalism," is that it is a western style for dominating,
restructuring, and having authority over the Orient. Said argues that this idea
of the Orient as a place of cultural difference and inferiority has been used
to justify imperialism and colonialism.
One criticism of Said's argument is that he overgeneralizes
and presents the West as a monolithic entity with a unified approach to the
Orient. Additionally, some scholars have argued that Said does not sufficiently
take into account the agency and resistance of colonized peoples and cultures.
Another criticism is that Said does not adequately address
the fact that some Western scholars and writers have produced work that is
sympathetic to and respectful of Eastern cultures, and that not all Western
perspectives on the East are necessarily Orientalist.
Additionally, Said's definition of Orientalism has been
criticized for focusing too much on the West and not enough on the internal
dynamics and complexities of Eastern cultures and societies.
Overall, Said's argument has been influential in highlighting
the ways in which Western perspectives have been used to stereotype,
marginalize, and dominate non-Western cultures. However, some argue that it has
limitations and doesn't account for all perspectives.
What does Edward Said mean by Orientalizing the Orient '?
Edward Said uses the term "Orientalizing the
Orient" to describe the process by which the West constructs a
representation of the East as a place of difference, exoticism, and
inferiority. According to Said, the West creates this representation through a
variety of means, including literature, art, scholarship, and political
discourse.
Said argues that this representation of the East is not a
neutral or objective depiction of reality, but rather a product of the West's
own cultural and political interests. He contends that the West
"Orientalizes" the East in order to justify imperialism and
colonialism by portraying the East as inferior and in need of Western
intervention and control.
Furthermore, Said contends that this representation of the
East has been internalized by the people of the East and the West, leading to a
self-perpetuating cycle of "Orientalism" that continues to shape
Western perceptions of the East and Eastern perceptions of themselves.
In summary, "Orientalizing the Orient" refers to
the process of creating a specific representation of the East, as a place of
difference, exoticism and inferiority by the West which then used to justify
imperialism and colonialism and is internalized by the people of the East and
the West alike.
What are the main aspects of Orientalism?
Edward Said identifies several key aspects of Orientalism in his book "Orientalism." These include:
- The creation of a binary opposition between the West and the East: Said argues that the West creates a representation of the East as a place of difference, exoticism, and inferiority, in contrast to the West as a place of rationality, progress, and civilization.
- The use of this representation to justify imperialism and colonialism: Said contends that the West's depiction of the East as inferior and in need of Western intervention and control is used to justify imperialism and colonialism.
- The internalization of this representation by both the West and the East: Said argues that this representation of the East has been internalized by the people of the East and the West, leading to a self-perpetuating cycle of "Orientalism" that continues to shape Western perceptions of the East and Eastern perceptions of themselves.
The importance of knowledge and scholarship in shaping the
representation of the East: Said contends that the West's representation of the
East is produced and perpetuated through literature, art, scholarship, and
political discourse. He argues that Western scholars and academics have played
a key role in creating and maintaining the representation of the East.
Examine Said’s definition of Orientalism. Do you find any flaws, or
loop holes, in his argument
The representation of the East is fundamentally a political
and ideological construct, not a neutral or objective depiction of reality:
Said argues that the West's representation of the East is not a neutral or
objective depiction of reality, but rather a product of the West's own cultural
and political interests.
The representation of the East is a way to control and
dominate the East. Said argues that the West's representation of the East is a
way to control and dominate the East, making the East a subject of the West,
and not a subject of its own.
Overall, Said's theory of Orientalism argues that the West's
representation of the East is a product of the West's own cultural and
political interests, which is used to justify imperialism, colonialism, and to
control and dominate the East.
ALSO READ:-
What is the importance of a Dalit Consciousness' in Dalit writings
For PDF , Handwritten
WhatsApp – 8130208920
(Send
Your Subject Code or Question paper)
0 comments:
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.