Describe the steps and techniques in modifying dysfunctional attitudes

 Describe the steps and techniques in modifying dysfunctional attitudes

Modifying dysfunctional attitudes involves several steps and techniques, which can include the following:

Identifying and becoming aware of negative thoughts and attitudes. This can be done through journaling, self-reflection, or therapy.

ALSO READ:-

 Explain intrinsic and extrinsic motivation

dysfunctional attitudes examples, dysfunctional attitudes scale pdf, dysfunctional attitude scale manual, dysfunctional attitude scale 40-item pdf, dysfunctional attitude scale interpretation, dysfunctional attitude scale questionnaire, dysfunctional attitude scale short form, dysfunctional attitude scale scoring

Describe the steps and techniques in modifying dysfunctional attitudes

Analyzing the thought patterns to determine if they are irrational or unrealistic. This can be done by questioning the evidence for and against the thought, and looking at whether the thought is based on a logical or a emotional perspective.

  • Challenging and refuting the negative thoughts by evaluating them against reality. This can be done by identifying the distortions in thought and replacing them with more balanced and realistic thinking.
  • Practicing cognitive restructuring, which involves replacing negative thoughts with more positive and constructive ones.
  • Engage in activities that you enjoy and that have been effective in reducing stress, such as exercise, meditation, or yoga.
  • Building a supportive network of family and friends who can provide a positive perspective and encouragement.
  • Seek professional help if the negative thoughts persist, such as counseling, therapy or coaching.

It's important to note that attitude modification takes time and effort, it can be challenging and requires consistency, but the end result is more positive and realistic view of self, others and world.

Describe the steps and techniques in modifying dysfunctional attitudes

Dysfunctional Attitude Scale is one of the most common instruments used to assess cognitive vulnerability. This study aimed to develop and validate a short form of Dysfunctional Attitude Scale appropriate for an Iranian clinical population. Participants were 160 psychiatric patients from medical centers affiliated with Isfahan Medical University, as well as 160 non-patients. Research instruments were clinical interviews based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-IV-TR, Dysfunctional Attitude Scale and General Heath Questionnaire (GHQ-28). Data was analyzed using multicorrelation calculations and factor analysis. Based on the results of factor analysis and item-total correlation, 14 items were judged candidates for omission. Analysis of the 26-item Dysfunctional Attitude Scale (DAS-26) revealed a Cronbach's alpha of 0.92. Evidence for the concurrent criterion validity was obtained through calculating the correlation between the Dysfunctional Attitude Scale and psychiatric diagnosis (r = 0.55), GHQ -28 (r = 0.56) and somatization, anxiety, social dysfunction, and depression subscales (0.45,0.53,0.48, and 0.57, respectively). Factor analysis deemed a four-factor structure the best. The factors were labeled as success-perfectionism, need for approval, need for satisfying others, and vulnerability-performance evaluation. The results showed that the Iranian version of the Dysfunctional Attitude Scale (DAS-26) bears satisfactory psychometric properties suggesting that this cognitive instrument.

As generally present cognitive constructions in humans, attitudes influence thoughts, emotions and behavior. They may become dysfunctional while maladaptive patterns of reactions occur and perpetuate when encountering environmental stimuli, resulting in incapability to mobilise resources in order to maintain optimal functioning. Dysfunctional attitudes are overgeneralised, inconsistent, unrealistic beliefs organized into a continuum regarding the individual’s self, the world and the future (Beck, Rush, Shaw, & Emery, 1979). Appearing in mentally healthy individuals as well as in people with diagnosed mental disorders (i.e. depression and anxiety disorders), they develop during adapting to stressful life events. Extensive research investigating depression found that dysfunctional attitudes are not only maintaining/covarying factors of depressive symptoms, but also predictors of depressive relapse and predictors of depressive episode frequency (Brouwer, Williams, Forand, DeRubeis, & Bockting, 2019; Ingram, Miranda, & Segal, 1998;

Describe the steps and techniques in modifying dysfunctional attitudes

Scher, Ingram, & Segal, 2005; Scotte, 1995; Thase & Simons, 1992; Theasdal & Dent, 1987). Therefore, measuring dysfunctional attitudes is also a clinically relevant question. In contrast with the majority of questionnaires assessing dysfunctional attitudes and beliefs that target specific problems – such as sleep (Dysfunctional Attitudes and Beliefs about Sleep; Morin, Vallières, & Ivers, 2007) or sexuality (Sexual Dysfunctional Beliefs Questionnaire; Nobre, Gouveia, & Gomes, 2003) –, dysfunctional attitudes are measured in a wider sense by the Dysfunctional Attitude Scale (DAS). The 40-item DAS, as a widely accepted and applied questionnaire, was developed by Arlene Nancy Weissman (1979) and was completed by graduates and undergraduates. An initial, item-pool version of the DAS contained a hundred, 7-point Likert scale items in order to create two parallel forms that measure the distinctive characteristics of depressive cognitions.

Applying principal component analysis with varimax rotation to form the structure of the questionnaire, Weissman found ten factors but used only one global dimension, as the aim of the study was to identify a general vulnerability factor to depression. As a result of empirical decisions, the DAS-A and the DAS-B comprising of 40 items and one general factor each, seemed psychometrically relevant, of which DAS form A remained the most widely applied version in clinical practice and depression research (e.g. Fuhr, Reitenbach, Kraemer, Hautzinger, & Meyer 2017; Senormanci et al., 2014). Since the DAS-A has become a common measurement tool to monitor cognitive therapeutic processes, a considerable amount of research has been carried out in several countries that proved the validity and reliability of the DAS in other languages (e.g. Ohrt & Thorell, 1998; Power et al., 1994; Sahin & Sahin, 1992).

ALSO READ:-

 Explain intrinsic and extrinsic motivation

IMPORTANT QUESTIONS:-

1) Explain the meaning of ‘behaviour’.

2) What do you understand by the term behaviour modification? 

3) Describe the principles of behaviour modification. \

4) List out the advantages of behavioural approach in counseling.  

 

0 comments:

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.