The domestic and international economic relations of the African continent
Introduction
The supply
of African slaves to American plantations reached an all-time high in the late
18th century (Klein 1999). After anti-slave trade legislation finally shut down
the Atlantic slave exports, commodity exports filled the gap. This so-called
‘commercial transition’ was completed in West Africa before it hit East Africa
(Austen 1987, Law 2002). It was a game-changer, since it put a halt to the
continuous drain of scarce labour and paved the way for the expansion of
landintensive forms of tropical agriculture, engaging smallholders, communal
farms, and estates.
The domestic and international economic relations of the African continent
The
establishment of colonial rule over the African interior (c. 1880-1900)
reinforced Africa’s commodity export growth. Colonial control facilitated the
construction of railways, induced large inflows of European investment, and
forced profound changes in the operation of labour and land markets (Frankema
and van Waijenburg 2012). That is, colonial regimes abolished slavery, but they
replaced it with other forced labour schemes. The scramble pushed African
exports to new heights, but without the preceding era of commercialisation the
African scramble probably would never have taken place.
Africa’s
commercial transition was inextricably connected to the rising demand for
industrial inputs from the industrialising core in the North Atlantic.
Revolutions in transportation (railways, steamships), a move towards liberal
trade policies in Europe, and increasing rates of GDP growth enhanced demand
for (new) manufactures, raw materials and tropical cash crops. African
producers responded to this demand by increasing exports of vegetable oils
(palm oil, groundnuts), gum, ivory, gold, hides and skins. Palm oil, a key
export, was highly valued as a lubricant for machinery and an ingredient in
food and soap. During and after the scramble, the range of commodity exports
broadened to include raw materials like rubber, cotton, and copper, as well as
cash crops such as cocoa, coffee, tea and tobacco. The lion’s share of these
commodities went directly to manufacturing firms and consumers in Europe.
Meanwhile, technological innovations also reduced the costs of colonial
occupation. These included the Maxim gun, the steamship, the railway and
quinine, the latter lowering the health risks to Europeans in the
disease-ridden interior of the ‘dark continent’.
The domestic and international economic relations of the African continent
To obtain a
deeper understanding of the connection between Africa’s commercial transition
and subsequent colonial intervention, we constructed annual time-series of
export volumes, export values, commodity export prices, import prices, and the
net barter terms (the ratio of average export to average import prices). The
data cover the period from the heyday of the Atlantic slave trade in the 1790s
to the eve of World War II,1 and make it possible to analyse the commercial
transition with much greater precision than was possible previously and to
compare the development of African trade with other commodity exporting regions
(Williamson 2011).
There was a
prolonged rise in the net barter terms of trade for sub-Saharan Africa from the
1790s to the 1880s, a commodity price boom that was especially pronounced in
the four decades between 1845 and 1885. Figure 1 shows that this secular price
boom peaked exactly at the date of the Berlin conference (1884-5), when
diplomats negotiated how to carve up Africa among the European imperialists.
The terms of trade tripled in just four decades. While the terms of trade for
commodity exporters were rising everywhere in what was once called the Third
World, nowhere was the boom greater than for Africa. Furthermore, the scramble
started right at the moment when African exports reached their highest exchange
value.
For More Answers Get
Solved PDF WhatsApp – 8130208920
0 comments:
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.