MPYE 002 Solved
Assignment 2022-23
IGNOU MPYE
002 Solved Assignment 2022-23, FREE MPYE 002 Solved
Assignment 2022 , FREE MPYE 002 ETHICS Assignment PDF , How to
get MPYE 002 Solved Assignment for Free, We are providing
IGNOU MPYE 002 ETHICS Solved Assignment all over India.
In
this website students will get the all solutions related with their IGNOU
Assignments, IGNOU Study Material, IGNOU Previous Years Papers and IGNOU Study
Notes, MPYE 002 ETHICS Solved Assignment 2022-23 is for those
candidate who want to submit their assignments on time.
FREE
IGNOU MPYE 002 Solved Assignment 2022-23, students can
directly done their assignment by simply take reference through our free ignou
service. MPYE 002 Free solved assignment available here.
MPYE 002 ETHICS Solved
Assignment 2022-23
Answer any five questions selecting at least two
from each of the sections.
Your answers should be in about 500 words
each.
1.
What is discourse ethics? Evaluate the rules of argumentation in discourse
ethics given by Habermass. 20
The purpose of this essay is to reveal the central
distinctive elements of Jürgen Habermas’ theory of discourse ethics and how his
moral theory differs from those of two other prominent philosophers, Immanuel
Kant and John Rawls. In unveiling the distinctive qualities of Habermas’
discourse ethics, the fundamental difference between it and Kant’s moral
theory, upon which Habermas in part bases his thought, will be explained. Next,
in exposing another distinctive element of discourse ethics, a pivotal
difference between Habermas’ moral theory and John Rawls’ theory of justice
will be elucidated.
Jürgen Habermas’ theory of discourse ethics contains two
distinctive characteristics: (I) it puts forth as its fundamental tenet a
prerequisite of participation in argumentation for testing the validity of a
norm and (ii) it transforms the individual nature of Kant’s categorical
imperative into a collective imperative by reformulating it to ensure the
expression of a general will and by elevating it to a rule of argumentation.
The proceduralism of the first characteristic sets Habermas’ discourse ethics
apart from the moral theory of John Rawls. The second characteristic
differentiates it from Kantian moral theory and, again, from Rawls’ theory of
justice.
Habermas’ moral theory is grounded in the principle of
discourse ethics, which can be viewed as a principle of argumentation. It
stipulates that “only those norms can claim to be valid that meet (or could
meet) with the approval of all affected in their capacity as participants in a
practical discourse.”1 This practical discourse, Habermas writes, is “a
procedure for testing the validity of hypothetical norms, not for producing
justified norms.”2 In this way Habermas’ discourse ethics guarantees that the
process of making judgements is carried out impartially, in contrast to Rawls’
theory of justice, which seeks to make impartial the orientation of an
individual making a moral judgement. Unlike Rawls’ (and Kant’s) theory,
Habermas’ principle of discourse ethics ensures that the universalist principle
can be interpreted only as expressing the normative content of a procedure, not
the normative content of the argument. Indeed, Habermas makes it clear that his
theory contains no hint of substantive moral content.
As the practical discourse on a norm unfolds, Habermas’
universalization principle, adapted from Kant’s categorical imperative, guides
the argumentation of the participants while guarding its rationality. But Habermas’
universalization principle, though borrowed from Kant’s moral theory, differs
from the categorical imperative in that it extends Kant’s tenet to explicitly
include as participants all those affected by a norm. Habermas’ formulation of
the universalization principle, which is “intended to compel the universal
exchange of roles,”3 precludes its monological application. Kant’s categorical
imperative, on the other hand, requires only a monological application by the
individual pondering the norm. Articulating his ethical system in Metaphysic of
Morals, published in 1785, Kant described his categorical imperative as
follows: “Act only according to a maxim by which you can at the same time will
that it shall become a general law.” Kant’s categorical imperative permits an
individual to ascribe as valid for everyone any maxim that he would will to be
a universal law
Habermas’ theory modifies Kant’s categorical imperative to
explicitly include all those involved in or affected by a conflict. Habermas’
principle of universalization holds that “for a norm to be valid, the
consequences and side effects of its general observance for the satisfaction of
each person’s particular interests must be acceptable to all.”4 Habermas’
principle reformulates the categorical imperative to necessitate that a maxim
must be submitted to everyone to test its claim to universality. “The emphasis
shifts from what each can will without contradiction to be a general law, to
what all can will in agreement to be a universal norm.”5 In this way Habermas
transforms Kant’s categorical imperative from a maxim pertaining to the
individual into one governing all participants involved in the testing of norm.
As such, the universalization principle transcends its former role as an
imperative to become, in Habermas’ words, a “procedure for argumentation.”
Or
What
are three postulates of morality in Kantian Ethics? Discuss briefly. 10+10= 20
2.
What are the objections of Karl-Otto Apel against previous moral theories?
Discuss. 10+10= 20
Or
Explain
and evaluate the idea of diversity of morals given by Morris Ginsberg. 20
3.
Give answer of any two questions in about 250 words each. 2*10= 20
a)
“Violence is morally wrong.” How would intuitionist, realist and relativist
analyze this moral statement?
b)
Evaluate the idea of war in the light of Deontology and Utilitarianism. 10
c)
What do you understand by Right to Life? Discuss the idea of dignified life in
the context of cultural relativism and realism. 10
d)
Compare human order with moral order. 10
4.
Give answer of any four questions in about 150 words each. 4*5= 20
a)
Write a note on the D. Ross’s idea of human duties. 5
b)
Write a note on Cultural Relativism.
c)
Write a note on the social responsibility of media. 5
d)
Write a note on MacIntyre’s virtue ethics. 5
e)
Evaluate moral realism in the light of Bio Ethical issues. 5 6
f)
Write a note on moral intuitionism? 5
g)
Write a short note on the Levinas’ idea of moral responsibility. 5
5.
Write short notes on any five in about 100 words each. 5*4= 20
a)
Panchasila 4
b)
Svadharma 4
c)
Distributive Justice 4
d)
Situation Ethics 4
e)
Deontology 4
f)
Free Will 4
g)
Virtue Ethics 4
h)
Hypothetical Imperative
MPYE 002 Handwritten
Assignment 2022-23
We provide handwritten PDF and Hardcopy to our IGNOU and other
university students. There are several types of handwritten assignment we
provide all Over India. We are genuinely work in this field for so many time.
You can get your assignment done - 8130208920
Important Note - You may be aware that you
need to submit your assignments before you can appear for the Term End Exams.
Please remember to keep a copy of your completed assignment, just in case the
one you submitted is lost in transit.
Submission Date :
· 31st March 2023 (if
enrolled in the July 2022 Session)
· 30th Sept, 2023 (if
enrolled in the January 2023 session).
IGNOU Instructions for the MPYE 002 Assignments
MPYE 002 ETHICS Assignment 2022-23 Before
attempting the assignment, please read the following instructions carefully.
MPYE 002 ETHICS Solved Assignment 2022-23 , IGNOU MPYE
002 Solved Assignment 2022-23 Download PDF ,MPYE 002 Solved assignment pdf , MPYE
002 Solved Assignment , MPYE 002 Assignment 2022-23, MPYE 002 Solved
Assignment 2022-23, IGNOU MPYE 002 Solved Assignment 2022-23
1.
Read the detailed instructions about the assignment given in the Handbook and
Programme Guide.
2.
Write your enrolment number, name, full address and date on the top
right corner of the first page of your response sheet(s).
3.
Write the course title, assignment number and the name of the study centre you are
attached to in the centre of the first page of your response sheet(s).
4. Use
only foolscap size paper for your response and tag all the pages
carefully
5.
Write the relevant question number with each answer.
6.
You should write in your own handwriting.
GUIDELINES FOR IGNOU
Assignments 2022-23
MPYE 002 Solved Assignment 2022-23 You will find it
useful to keep the following points in mind:
1. Planning: Read the questions carefully. Go through the units on
which they are based. Make some points regarding each question and then
rearrange these in a Ethicsal order. And please write the answers in your own
words. Do not reproduce passages from the units.
MPYE 002 ETHICS Solved Assignment 2022-23 , IGNOU MPYE
002 Solved Assignment 2022-23 Download PDF ,MPYE 002 Solved assignment pdf , MPYE
002 Solved Assignment , MPYE 002 Assignment 2022-23, MPYE 002 Solved
Assignment 2022-23, IGNOU MPYE 002 Solved Assignment 2022-23
2. Organisation: Be a little more selective and analytic
before drawing up a rough outline of your answer. In an essay-type question,
give adequate attention to your introduction and conclusion. The introduction
must offer your brief interpretation of the question and how you propose to
develop it. The conclusion must summarise your response to the question. In the
course of your answer, you may like to make references to other texts or critics as this will add some depth
to your analysis.
3. Presentation: Once you are satisfied with your answers,
you can write down the final version for submission, writing each answer neatly
and underlining the points you wish to emphasize.
IGNOU Assignment Front Page
The top of the first page of your response sheet should look like
this: Get IGNOU Assignment Front page through. And Attach on front page
of your assignment. Students need to compulsory attach the front page in at the
beginning of their handwritten assignment.
MPYE 002 ETHICS Solved Assignment 2022-23 , IGNOU MPYE
002 Solved Assignment 2022-23 Download PDF ,MPYE 002 Solved assignment pdf , MPYE
002 Solved Assignment , MPYE 002 Assignment 2022-23, MPYE 002 Solved
Assignment 2022-23, IGNOU MPYE 002 Solved Assignment 2022-23
ENROLMENT NO: …………………………………………………….
NAME: ……………………………………………………………………
ADDRESS: ………………………………………………………………
COURSE TITLE: ……………………………………………………...
ASSIGNMENT NO: …………………………………………………
STUDY CENTRE: …………………………………………….……..
DATE: ……………………………………………………………………
MPYE 002 Handwritten
Assignment 2022-23
We provide handwritten PDF and Hardcopy to our IGNOU and other
university students. There are several types of handwritten assignment we
provide all Over India. We are genuinely work in this field for so many time.
You can get your assignment done - 8130208920
Let’s see all these subjects-
- MPY 001 Solved Assignment 2022-23
- MPYE 001 Solved Assignment 2022-23
- MEG Solved Assignment 2022-23
- MSO 001 Solved Assignment 2022-23
PDF & Handwritten
WhatsApp - 8130208920
0 comments:
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.