Foucault’s concept of ‘archaeology of knowledge’
Foucault’s concept of ‘archaeology of knowledge’ Foucault never attempts at any definition of power but gives a definition of power relations at best. “The exercise of power is not simply a relationship between partners, individuals or collective; it is a way in which certain actions modify others. Which is to say, of course, that something called power with or without a capital letter, which is assumed to exist universally in a concentrated or diffused form, does not exist.” Foucault’s concept of ‘archaeology of knowledge’ Foucault goes on to insist that knowledge and power are always and necessarily interdependent. A site where power is enforced is also a site where knowledge is produced and conversely, a site from which knowledge is derived is a place where power is exercised. In ‘Discipline and Punish’ he sees prison as an example of just such a site of power, and as a place where knowledge, essential to the modern social sciences, was formed. Foucault’s concept of ‘archaeology of knowledge’ Reciprocally the ideas from which the social sciences were formulated were also the ones that gave birth to the prison. The belief that a scientist can arrive at an objective conclusion, Foucault argues, is one of the greatest fallacies of the modern, humanist era.
Foucault’s Archeological Writings
Foucault’s concept of ‘archaeology of knowledge’: Foucault’s
early work provides an archaeology of knowledge, wherein he deconstructs the
underlying unconscious rationalities of historically specific domains. In his
first major work, Madness and Civilisation, Foucault traces the evolution of
the relationship between insanity and modern reason. He examines the historical
and discursive process whereby insanity is constructed as the opposite of
rationality and is systematically separated from reason through “discourses of
exclusion and institutions of confinement”.
An inquiry into the effect of discourse on the social and political environment would require an evaluation of material institutions. Foucault’s concept of ‘archaeology of knowledge’ This principle guides Foucault’s next intellectual phase, in which he borrows from the Nietzschean principle of genealogy to concentrate explicitly on power effects and their relationship with knowledge.
0 comments:
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.